
元裁判官・立命館大法科大学院教授の平野哲郎さんに聞く、裁判の公開原則と海外の事情
英国、フランス、オーストラリア、カナダ、韓国などが最高裁判所や憲法裁判所の審理をインターネットでライブ中継している。日本の憲法82条が定める裁判の公開原則の目的は主権者による司法のチェックであり、最高裁の弁論をオンライン公開すれば国民審査の判断材料にもなる。元裁判官で立命館大法科大学院教授の平野哲郎さん(57)に話を聞いた。
AI-generated summary
日本の憲法82条が裁判の公開原則を定めている。海外では英国、フランス、オーストラリア、カナダ、韓国などが最高裁判所や憲法裁判所の審理をインターネットでライブ中継し、アーカイブ映像も公開している。
海外では最高裁の審理などがインターネットで中継されています。「裁判の公開原則」を憲法で定める日本でも選択肢になり得るのでしょうか。もたらされるものとは。海外の事情に詳しい元裁判官で、立命館大法科大学院教授の平野哲郎さん(57)に話を聞きました。
海外ではアーカイブ映像も
英国、フランス、オーストラリア、カナダ、韓国などの国が、最高裁判所や憲法裁判所の審理をインターネットなどでライブ中継しています。アーカイブ映像も公開し、英国最高裁が欧州連合(EU)からの離脱(ブレグジット)直前の議会閉会の適法性について判断した訴訟や韓国憲法裁判所による前大統領の弾劾(だんがい)審判の動画を、誰でもいつでも見ることができます。
日本の憲法82条が定める裁判の公開原則の目的は、主権者である国民による司法のチェックです。加えて人々の裁判への理解と関心を深める意義もあります。
日本も民事、刑事訴訟の最高裁の弁論をオンライン公開すれば、裁判官と弁護士の議論を誰もが視聴でき、最高裁判事の国民審査の判断材料にもなります。公開の対象を最高裁の弁論に限れば、尋問などはなく、プライバシー侵害の懸念は小さいといえます。発言の切り取りやAI(人工知能)による加工も、裁判所の公式サイトで全編を公開すれば、検証可能です。
市民に届く法廷に
また同性婚訴訟など、社会的…

It has been revealed that the Fukuoka Prefectural Police visually checked the "suspect notebooks" of arrested and detained suspects during property inspections. Notes submitted by defense attorneys are said to be protected by the right of confidential communication, but prefectural police checked for several seconds to make sure there were no dangerous objects or instructions to destroy evidence. The company said it has reviewed its operations and taken into consideration human rights and security needs.

On the 10th, the Fukuoka District Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim in a lawsuit filed against six expressway companies and the government by a man who had his application for an ETC personal card rejected because he was affiliated with an organized crime group. The plaintiffs argued that the expressway is a public property, and that not being able to use it just because they are affiliated with an organized crime group constitutes unreasonable discrimination.

On the 9th, a lawsuit filed by the former Johnny's Office (SMILE-UP.) against former vice president Shimon Ishimaru, seeking confirmation of the non-existence of any liability for damages, was settled at the Saitama District Court. Mr. Ishimaru praised Smile Up's provision of payment of settlement money as an extension of the idea of the Victim Relief Committee. The amount of compensation has not been disclosed.

The third trial of defendant Kentaro Kitagawa (67), a former chief public prosecutor at the Osaka District Public Prosecutors Office, was held at the Osaka District Court on the 6th, and the female prosecutor tearfully testified about the sexual assault during which she was drunk, saying, ``My heart and body froze.'' The claims of both sides are in direct conflict.

Kenji Kusunoki (58), who lost his wife and eldest daughter when his seven-story building collapsed in the Noto Peninsula Earthquake on New Year's Day 2024, filed a lawsuit in Tokyo District Court seeking approximately 215 million yen in damages from the government and the corporation that owns the building. Based on the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism's expert committee report, the building alleges earthquake resistance defects and the government's inaction.

The Tokyo High Court upheld the 20-year prison sentence handed down by the Maebashi District Court of the first instance and dismissed the defense's appeal against a former driver in Isesaki City, Gunma Prefecture who was charged with causing death and injury by dangerous driving in 2024 for causing the deaths of three family members while driving under the influence.