
男子陳崇宇去年毒駕撞死73歲老翁,基隆地院國民法庭判處7年8月徒刑。死者女兒泣訴判刑過輕,並質疑立法院剛三讀通過的毒駕加重修法仍需累犯才判死,無法為第一位受害者申冤。
男子陳崇宇去年12月吸毒無照駕駛賓士車撞死73歲陳姓老翁,基隆地方法院國民法庭30日依毒駕致死罪判處7年8月徒刑。死者女兒陳姳潔痛批判刑過輕,並質疑立法院同日三讀通過的毒駕累犯致死可判死修法,須再犯才能判死對首位被害人不公。
AI-generated summary
男子陳崇宇於去年12月吸毒後無照駕駛賓士車暴衝,撞死倒垃圾的73歲老翁並致傷3人。
男子陳崇宇去年12月吸毒後無照駕駛賓士車,失控暴衝,撞死倒垃圾的73歲陳姓老翁,並撞傷3名男子。
男子陳崇宇去年毒駕撞死出門倒垃圾的陳姓老翁,基隆地方法院國民法庭今天上午11點半宣判,依毒駕致死罪判處陳男7年8月徒刑。面對判決結果,陳翁第4個女兒陳姳潔泣訴:「撞死一條人命,才判7年8個月」、「我爸爸是失去生命,他只是失去幾年自由而已,懲罰一點都不夠!」巧合的是,立法院今日下午隨即三讀通過中華民國刑法部分條文修正案,明定毒駕累犯致死最高可處死刑,並得併科新台幣1000萬元以下罰金。
針對立法院通過加重毒駕慣犯刑度,陳姳潔說,立法院三讀通過毒駕累犯致死可判死,意思就是第一次毒駕時,有撞死人不會被判死,要等到再犯毒駕,撞死另一個人,才能判死,因此就是要出現第二個受害者,法官才能判這名毒駕慣犯死刑,請問第一個被撞死的被害人,不是人嗎?第一個被撞死的人,誰來替他申冤?到底還要死多少人,才能換得司法的重視?
陳姳潔說,政府若不以重罰來遏止毒駕歪風,在毒駕第一次撞死人時,就判處毒駕者死刑,還會有更多被害人枉死,更多被害人的家屬哀痛欲絕;下一個被害人或許是你身邊的人,又或是你認識的人,毒駕致死案一定會繼續不斷的發生。
此外,陳姳潔也對台灣的司法讓人失望,她表示,現行刑法毒駕致死最重可以判10年,至少也應該判到9年、接近10年,但國民法官卻只判陳冠宇7年8月徒刑;她一定會上訴,為先父討公道。
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
被害人家屬將提出上訴
Very likely · Within weeks

The Hong Kong Bar Association urged the government to clearly define criminal thresholds and whistle-blower immunity rules for its proposed bid-rigging ban, following a deadly fire in Tai Po.

The U.S. federal court in Florida dismissed Trump's defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, finding that Trump failed to prove that the report was actually malicious and ruled that no further lawsuits could be filed. The case involves reports on Trump’s relationship with the late billionaire Epstein.

The Bar Association has called on the government to speed up judicial infrastructure projects by repurposing the District Court building and to offer pay increases to attract top legal talent from the private sector.

Hong Kong's Secretary for Justice Paul Lam Ting-kwok said proposed legislative amendments aim to bring a 'revolutionary overhaul' to building maintenance by cracking down on bid-rigging.

Wang Moumou, a staff member of an Internet company, knew clearly that the area around the military airport was a no-fly zone, but still illegally controlled a drone to approach military aircraft taking off and landing and take videos. The national security agency punished him in accordance with the law and ordered him to delete the video and eliminate the impact.

The Supreme People's Court released the third batch of typical cases involving people's jurors. A company filed an administrative lawsuit after being fined 700,000 yuan for falsely advertising the probability of winning a blind box prize. The court rejected the appeal at the second instance and upheld the original judgment. People's assessors rely on their professional experience to see through the false advertising behavior of businesses that use forensic identification to mislead consumers.