
AI-generated summary
Trump's defamation lawsuit over the Wall Street Journal's reporting on his relationship with Epstein has been dismissed and is being filed again.
(Central News Agency, Washington, 31st Comprehensive Foreign News Report) The Wall Street Journal was sued by Trump for defamation for reporting on the relationship between US President Trump and the late sex criminal tycoon Epstein. A U.S. court today dismissed Trump's second lawsuit against the newspaper, and no further lawsuits will be filed.
Reuters reported that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida found that Trump once again failed to prove that the other party had actual malice, which is a necessary requirement for a public figure to file a defamation lawsuit.
"As with his first attempt, he failed this time," Judge Darrin P. Gayles of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida wrote.
Gales stressed that The Wall Street Journal conducted a "careful and detailed investigation" and that reporters sought comments from Trump and other officials before the article was published.
"The Amended Complaint vainly attempts to fabricate deficiencies in the investigation," Gales wrote.
Trump's lawyers argued that the Wall Street Journal should remove the report after Trump denied ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
"The legal standard of actual malice is not such, and such a claim violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution," Gales wrote.
Trump has previously refiled the lawsuit, seeking at least $10 billion in damages. The court dismissed the lawsuit today and barred further prosecution, meaning the case cannot be brought to court again.

The Hong Kong Bar Association urged the government to clearly define criminal thresholds and whistle-blower immunity rules for its proposed bid-rigging ban, following a deadly fire in Tai Po.

The Bar Association has called on the government to speed up judicial infrastructure projects by repurposing the District Court building and to offer pay increases to attract top legal talent from the private sector.

Hong Kong's Secretary for Justice Paul Lam Ting-kwok said proposed legislative amendments aim to bring a 'revolutionary overhaul' to building maintenance by cracking down on bid-rigging.

Wang Moumou, a staff member of an Internet company, knew clearly that the area around the military airport was a no-fly zone, but still illegally controlled a drone to approach military aircraft taking off and landing and take videos. The national security agency punished him in accordance with the law and ordered him to delete the video and eliminate the impact.

The Supreme People's Court released the third batch of typical cases involving people's jurors. A company filed an administrative lawsuit after being fined 700,000 yuan for falsely advertising the probability of winning a blind box prize. The court rejected the appeal at the second instance and upheld the original judgment. People's assessors rely on their professional experience to see through the false advertising behavior of businesses that use forensic identification to mislead consumers.

On October 30, the Supreme People's Court issued typical cases of service guarantee for winter heating, covering four types of high-risk dispute scenarios: breach of contract for exceeding the scope of heat use, illegal use of heat in private pipe networks, breach of guarantee of upstream fuel supply, and long-term heat supply arrears, to provide judicial protection for winter heating work.