
AI-generated summary
Illegal surveillance apps were sold disguised as location tracking apps for monitoring children, but were actually promoted as programs that could monitor the infidelity of a spouse or lover. The app had a structure where the icon disappeared when installed, making it difficult for users to recognize the fact of surveillance.
Automatic call recording and location transmission... 6,000 downloads
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Lee Mi-ryeong = A seven-year prison sentence was confirmed for an operator who made billions of won by selling a mobile phone surveillance application (app) that intercepts phone calls in real time and secretly collects location information.
According to the legal community on the 4th, the 2nd Division of the Supreme Court (Chief Justice Oh Gyeong-mi) recently confirmed the original trial verdict that sentenced Mr. A, the operator of a mobile phone monitoring app sales company, to 7 years in prison, 5 years of suspension, and a fine of 1.97 billion won, who was handed over to trial on charges of violation of the Communications Secrets Protection Act and violation of the Information and Communications Network Act.
Mr. A and others were brought to trial on charges of selling a malicious app capable of illegal wiretapping from January 2019 to November 2024, secretly recording other people's conversations, and collecting and providing personal location information without the parties' consent.
When an app user secretly installs a file on the monitored person's cell phone, the GPS location, messages, and call content are intercepted, stored, and recorded in real time and transmitted to the server, and the user can view the information by paying a fee.
The installation icon disappeared from the monitored person's cell phone, making it difficult for the person involved to even notice that the app was running.
On the outside, they promoted it as a 'location tracking app for monitoring children,' but on blogs, it was found that they used keywords such as 'cheating husband' to promote it as a 'program that can monitor the infidelity of a spouse or lover.'
After the free trial period, the app usage fee was 500,000 won for 1 month, 1.5 million won for 3 months, and 2.8 million won for 6 months.
The number of people who downloaded it reached 6,008.
The number of call files illegally recorded by Mr. A and others was approximately 120,000.
Additionally, the total revenue they earned from providing illegal location information collection services to 980 app buyers was 3.39 billion won.
The prosecution brought them to trial, claiming that they had colluded with app buyers and violated the Communications Secrets Protection Act.
The first trial sentenced Mr. A to 7 years in prison and 5 years of suspension of qualifications, employee B to 1 year and 6 months in prison and 3 years of suspension of qualifications, and Mr. C, the owner of the company, to 1 year and 6 months in prison and 3 years of probation.
In his appeal, Mr. A argued that joint criminal activity with app purchasers was not established, saying, "I only sold the app, but the purchasers made the recording."
However, the second trial dismissed Mr. A's appeal, saying, "The sequential and implicit collusion relationship with app purchasers is recognized, and functional control of behavior through essential contribution to the crime based on it is also recognized."
The app itself basically provides call recording and playback functions, and Mr. A and others emphasized the wiretapping function in their advertisements, and made an essential contribution to crime by providing instructions on how to secretly install it during the consultation process.
The second trial court said, “The guilt is very serious as it is a crime that imposes serious restrictions on the privacy and freedom of privacy guaranteed by the Constitution.”
Mr. A appealed again, but the Supreme Court found no error in this judgment and dismissed the appeal.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Additional investigations into similar illegal surveillance apps will be conducted.
Likely · Within months
Legislative discussions regarding the Personal Information Protection Act will become more active.
Possible · Within months

Several foreigners got into a fight in the middle of the night in Poseung-eup, Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do, and two people, including Mr. A of Russian nationality and Mr. B of Kyrgyzstan nationality, were arrested as red-handed criminals, and the police are tracking the remaining suspects.

In relation to an incident at Cheongju Elementary School where a boy tried to kiss a girl and the girl suffered a lip injury after hitting a steel pillar while avoiding the boy, the parent of a boy who was subject to school violence filed a lawsuit against the Office of Education, but the court ruled that the plaintiff lost.

Suwon High Court's 14th Criminal Division dismissed the appeal of Mr. A, a man in his 60s who injured a police officer by swinging a paper bag containing a liquor bottle while drunk, and sentenced him to 1 year and 6 months in prison, the same as the original trial. In September of last year, Mr. A committed a crime by swearing at a police station in Jungwon-gu, Seongnam-si when he was asked to go home while demanding punishment for the business owner. As a result, Sergeant B, a police officer, suffered injuries that required more than 20 days of treatment, including a partial rupture of the muscle in his jaw.

A police officer from Seoul's Dongdaemun Police Station was arrested last month on charges of possessing, fabricating, and distributing sexually exploitative images, including deepfakes of people he knows and child sexual abuse material, following a months-long investigation that began in August after his mobile phone was seized and found to contain approximately 2,600 illicit images.

A drunk man in his 60s in Hwaseong was arrested by police on charges of assaulting a bus driver by brandishing a fire extinguisher, but the arrest warrant was dismissed due to securing evidence and admitting the charges.

Inspector A, a member of Dongdaemun Police Station in Seoul, was arrested on charges of producing over 400 false videos depicting acquaintances in the nude using an AI app and sharing false sexual videos in a Telegram chat room. As a result of the search and seizure, a total of 5,600 illegal videos were discovered, including 2,600 false videos, 1,600 sexually exploitative videos of children and adolescents, and 1,300 illegally filmed videos. Officer A had received a suspended indictment for a similar case even before joining the police.