
AI-generated summary
Rep. Joo Jin-woo claimed that the organization headed by the spouse of Justice Minister candidate Kim Seung-won received preferential treatment in the selection process for Suwon City's after-school activity service provider in 2022, and raised suspicions of manipulation of evaluation scores and unfair elimination of competitors.
“Competitors were unfairly excluded from the after-school activity service agency selection process”... Rep. Joo “reports to the judges”
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Lee Yullip = People Power Party lawmaker Joo Jin-woo claimed on the 13th that there is a suspicion that Suwon City gave preferential treatment by manipulating evaluation scores in the process of selecting a welfare institution headed by the spouse of Justice Minister candidate Kim Seung-won as an after-school activity service provider in Suwon, Gyeonggi Province, in 2022.
Rep. Joo held a press conference at the National Assembly on this day and said, "'Kim Seung-won's family corporation' was unfairly selected with clear preferential treatment," and "unfair zero points were given to intentionally eliminate competitors."
According to Rep. Joo, in 2022, Suwon City selected two of the three organizations that applied as after-school activity service providers, and the 'Korea Child Development Social Cooperative' (hereinafter referred to as Korea Child Development), an organization providing care services for the developmentally disabled, headed by Candidate Kim's spouse, ranked first with 82.5 points.
However, as a result of comparing the application and the scorecard for each judge, Rep. Joo claims that if it had been a normal review, Korea Child Development's quantitative score would have fallen by 11.25 points from 66.25 to 55, while Competitor A's score would have gone up from 55 to 65 points and Competitor B's would have gone up from 40 to 60 points.
Rep. Joo said, “Kim Seung-won’s Family Association is a new organization that has only been in Suwon for three months. However, 5 additional points were given to the re-designated agency,” he said. “As for the ‘secure score for securing replacement personnel,’ the competitor company was given 0 points even though it had secured two replacement workers in advance, while Kim Seung-won’s family union was given a perfect score of 5 even though it only wrote ‘fill in case of vacancy.’”
In addition, Korea Child Development announced that it received a perfect score of 10 for convenience facilities even though the elevator, main entrance, and information facilities were completed only on February 24, 8 days later than the application deadline of February 16, 2022.
Rep. Joo said, “In the end, the (competing) company that received 0 points was eliminated,” and “(Korea Child Development) did not have much activity when it was in Yongin City, but when Candidate Kim was elected to the National Assembly, it moved to Suwon City, his district, in January 2022.”
He added, “If it were not for Rep. Kim, it would be impossible for a new, unqualified union to receive such preferential scores in quantitative and qualitative evaluations in just three months.”
Rep. Joo said, "We will file criminal charges against Suwon City judges and others for loss of national treasury and abuse of power, and hold them legally responsible for unfair selection," and added, "The investigation should be expanded to include the overall review, whether candidate Kim Seung-won's couple was solicited, and suspicions of collusion with Suwon City."
Meanwhile, Rep. Joo raised the issue of Candidate Kim's son's attendance record at Korea Child Development, saying, "Since (Candidate Kim's son) is in charge of only one child, (the child's) absence means no work," and added, "I have been raising my salary while only taking charge of one person here (Candidate Kim's son). Is it right to say that we will raise suspicions and report people who raise problems?"
Previously, Rep. Joo claimed the day before that Candidate Kim's son's work record was blank three out of ten days while he worked at a welfare institution for the disabled where his mother is the director, but Candidate Kim's side refuted that this was due to the absence of a user receiving services from his son and did not mean that his son did not come to work.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
An audit or investigation into Suwon City's evaluation process will be conducted.
Likely · Within weeks
This suspicion will emerge as an issue during the confirmation hearing for candidate Seung-won Kim.
Very likely · Within days

Kim Seung-won, candidate for Minister of Justice, will appear at the National Assembly personnel hearing on the 15th. The opposition party announced that it would intensively investigate allegations of solicitation for approval of clinical trials for COVID-19 new drugs and controversy over private interests, while the ruling party is fighting back by raising suspicions about Rep. Han Dong-hoon's leak of prosecution investigation data. Candidate Kim explained that it was a public complaint, but controversy continues over the transcript of the call with Mr. Yang, suspicions of involvement in Genencell stock manipulation, and the judge's son's career as a legislative assistant.

Yong Hye-in, candidate for Minister of Gender Equality and Family, voluntarily resigned from her position 14 days after being nominated. He has been under pressure from the ruling and opposition parties to resign due to the controversy over concurrently serving as a proportional representative member and suspicions that he self-appointed his spouse to a party position, and decided to resign in response to the Democratic Party's request to express his future actions. He plans to maintain his proportional representation position.

As the Blue House again urges Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae to expedite the process of re-nomination of Supreme Court Justice candidates, attention is focused on whether Chief Justice Cho will make an official statement soon. Along with speculation that the Asia-Pacific Supreme Court Chief Justices' Conference period will be avoided, whether to reorganize the recommendation committee is emerging as an issue.

Lee So-young, a candidate for Minister of SMEs and Startups, refuted the suspicion that she paid about 70 million won in legislative activity service fees to a consulting company whose address on the corporate register was vacant while she was a member of the 21st National Assembly, saying it was a legal and normal service contract. It was explained that the contract was concluded by reviewing the consultant's individual experience and capabilities, not the company's location, and receipts were issued as usual. Lee Jong-bae, former People Power Party Seoul City Council member, plans to file a complaint against the candidate for violating the Political Fund Act.

On the 13th, lawmakers from the People Power Party's Gender Equality and Family Committee pressured the Blue House to urge the withdrawal of the candidate's nomination, saying that the Democratic Party of Korea is intentionally blocking the adoption of witnesses for the hearing of Minister of Gender Equality and Family Minister Yong Hye-in. They criticized the Democratic Party's attitude of adopting only 1 out of 28 witnesses, and argued that the attempt to force a hearing without meeting the legal deadline was a trick to hinder verification.

The amount of additional fares levied due to illegal rides on the Seoul subway reached 9.5 billion won over the past three years, but the actual amount collected was only 7.7 billion won, resulting in a collection rate of only 71%. Representative Yeom Tae-young of the Democratic Party of Korea pointed out that it is necessary to apply discriminatory sanctions and improve the collection system by considering the intentionality and repetition of illegal riders.