北京互联网法院通报一起涉平台治理网络服务合同纠纷案例,明确平台有权依约对录播冒充直播行为采取阶梯式处罚。
某贸易公司因在直播中用剪辑录播视频冒充实时直播,被平台永久封禁权限后起诉维权。北京互联网法院审理认为平台处罚合法有据,驳回原告全部诉讼请求,为直播行业敲响警钟。
AI-generated summary
北京互联网法院通报了涉平台治理网络服务合同纠纷审理情况,指出录播冒充直播违背诚实信用原则。
中新网北京11月11日电(记者 刘越)直播电商火热的当下,“实时互动”是主播赢得消费者信任的重要筹码。然而,有商家为降低成本,竟用录播视频冒充现场直播。
11月10日,北京互联网法院召开发布会通报涉平台治理网络服务合同纠纷审理情况,通报了一起“录播冒充直播”的案例。某贸易公司因在直播中多次使用剪辑拼接的录播内容伪装实时直播,被平台永久封禁直播权限后起诉维权,最终被法院驳回全部诉讼请求。
据法院披露,2025年12月,平台监测发现涉案账号多场直播存在异常特征:直播突然开始或结束、画面有明显修音改音痕迹、卡顿后突兀切换场景,存在明显的拼接剪辑痕迹。此前,该账号已因同类违规被短时封禁,且多次遭用户举报。平台依据用户协议,以“录播伪装直播”为由对其作出无限期封禁直播及连线权限的处罚。原告某贸易公司主张,录播内容同样具有商业价值,平台永久封禁处罚过重,要求解除限制并赔偿经济损失。
北京互联网法院审理认为,双方通过用户协议明确约定不得进行录播行为,原告多次实施该行为并引发用户投诉,对直播营销平台的健康运营生态产生不良影响。平台依照协议约定永久封禁涉案账号直播权限,具有充分事实依据,符合法律规定和协议约定。将录制内容包装为实时直播,使消费者误以为主播正在现场讲解,这直接突破了诚实信用经营的边界,此类行为不仅误导消费者,更通过降低直播成本获取不正当竞争优势,扰乱平台正常经营秩序。
数据显示,2024年至2026年10月,北京互联网法院受理的涉平台治理网络服务合同纠纷从311件激增至6909件,其中网络直播平台治理纠纷占比达36.1%,增幅显著。法院明确,平台有权依约对录播冒充直播行为采取阶梯式处罚。随着直播电商进入规范化发展阶段,“真实性”已成为平台治理的核心议题,本案为直播行业敲响警钟:技术造假难逃算法监测,诚信经营方能行稳致远。(完)

The Beijing Financial Court announced the application of special representative litigation procedures to the Oriental Securities false statement case. The China Securities Small and Medium Investor Service Center has been authorized to participate in litigation on behalf of investors. The China Securities Regulatory Commission has stated that it will support this move to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of investors and pursue legal liability.

Lin Qiyun, director of the Accounting Department of the Ministry of Finance, said in Beijing that after the completion of the revision of the Accounting Law and the Certified Public Accountant Law, the "15th Five-Year Plan" period will focus on improving supporting systems, combating financial fraud, and improving the quality of accounting and auditing, and insisting on equal emphasis on supervision and development.

A US federal judge rejected the BBC's bid to dismiss Donald Trump's multibillion-dollar defamation and consumer protection lawsuit over a deceptively edited documentary regarding the January 6 Capitol riot.
Anchor Jin was banned from the platform indefinitely for fabricating feudal superstitious stories such as "Treasure Hunting in Old Houses" and "Tai Sui Xingjun" during the live broadcast to induce fans' attention. After Jin sued to defend his rights, the first-instance judgment of the Beijing Internet Court rejected his claim, clarifying that the behavior was a violation and the platform's punishment was legal and reasonable.

China's Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security jointly released five typical cases of punishing money laundering crimes in accordance with the law on November 11, covering the use of financial intelligence, underground banks and shell company money laundering, etc., demonstrating the effectiveness of public prosecutors' coordinated efforts to combat money laundering crimes.
The Beijing Internet Court recently concluded an Internet service contract dispute. Anchor Li claimed that tea and probiotics can treat autism, tinnitus and eye protection during a live broadcast, but the platform permanently closed the product sharing function. The court held that it constituted false publicity and ruled to reject the plaintiff's claim.