
At the Journalism Ethics Forum of the Korea Newspaper Ethics Committee, Professor Heo Man-seop of Kangwon National University presented the state of public confusion caused by article-type advertisements and suggested that transparently revealing advertisements can increase both reliability and advertisement effectiveness.
AI-generated summary
Many people are experiencing confusion and misunderstanding due to 'article-type advertising', which makes it difficult to distinguish between an article and an advertisement, raising issues of decreased trust and consumer deception.
Professor Heo Man-seop: “It is more effective to transparently disclose whether there is an advertisement or not.”
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Go Mi-hye = A survey showed that 8 out of 10 people experienced confusion and misunderstanding due to 'article-type advertisements' that are not clearly distinguishable from articles.
Heo Man-seop, a professor in the Department of Digital Media and Communication at Kangwon National University, recently reported these findings through a presentation on ‘Improving the effectiveness of media autonomous deliberation related to article-type advertisements’ at the Journalism Ethics Forum hosted by the Korea Newspaper Ethics Committee.
As a result of Professor Heo's survey commissioned by Embrain last June to survey audience perceptions of article-type advertisements among 600 men and women over the age of 19, 80.0% of respondents answered that they 'often' or 'sometimes' experienced confusion while reading an article as to whether it was an article or an advertisement.
81.8% of respondents said they had read something they thought was an article but later realized it was an advertisement.
Readers’ evaluation of article-type advertisements was low. In terms of reliability and usability, it was rated in the low 2s out of 5. Most of the words that come to mind when thinking of 'article-type advertising' are negative, such as 'difficult to believe', 'unreliable', 'sophisticated', and 'deceptive'.
68.8% of respondents considered article-type advertisements to be a problem, and cited 'distortion of consumers' rational judgment', 'deception of consumers and readers', and 'lowering trust in the media' as the main reasons.
In this survey, Professor Heo also conducted an experiment in which respondents were asked to read various types of article-type advertising content, including those that explicitly stated that it was an advertisement and those that displayed the reporter's byline without indicating an advertisement. As a result, it was found that when it was indicated that it was an advertisement and the name of the advertiser was also revealed, it actually led to improved attitude towards the advertisement and purchase intention.
Professor Heo said, "This result demonstrates that transparently revealing that it is an advertisement increases trust and does not damage the effectiveness of the advertisement. However, there is a high possibility that recipients without prior knowledge will not be fully aware of the deceptiveness of article-type advertisements without advertisement indication."
Based on the results of this perception survey, the current status of article-type advertisements in Korea, and analysis of overseas cases, he proposed measures such as ▲ segmenting the byline notation to reflect sponsorship status, ▲ linking article-type advertisement violations with portal partnership evaluation, and ▲ providing media incentives to comply with self-deliberation in order to increase the effectiveness of self-review of article-type advertisements.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Korea Newspaper Ethics Committee will review and implement a plan to segment byline notation that reflects sponsorship status.
Likely · Within months
Measures to link portal partnership evaluation with article-type advertising violations will be discussed and detailed guidelines will be prepared.
Possible · Within months
![[Top news from major newspapers across the country] (Morning edition of the 7th)](/api/img?u=https%3A%2F%2Fr.yna.co.kr%2Fglobal%2Fhome%2Fv01%2Fimg%2Fyonhapnews_logo_1200x800_kr01.jpg&w=320&q=72&f=webp)
Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae of the Supreme Court argued in the National Assembly audit that the involvement of the President and the National Assembly in nominating Supreme Court justices was unconstitutional and expressed concern about undermining the separation of powers. Several media outlets are reporting on this issue, highlighting the constitutional conflict.

Major South Korean newspapers on Oct. 7 reported the chief justice declaring presidential and legislative requests to recommend court justices unconstitutional, while North Korea warned of 'powerful counteraction' if South Korea intrudes 'even millimeter' into its territory, and Shinsegae announced a $1 billion investment in Paramount's Warner Bros. deal.

The Press Arbitration Commission notified media companies that repeated the same type of rights infringement three or more times a half year with a corrective recommendation and posted it on their website. However, no action was taken in 206 cases, or 62.8% of the 206 cases, raising criticism that the effectiveness of the system was low. Rep. Oh-kyung Lim argued that media companies that repeatedly violate rights should be managed separately and tracked for corrections, deletions, and recurrences.

The Board of Directors of the Korea Broadcasting Culture Promotion Association, the majority shareholder of MBC, selected iMBC Director Lee Seong-joo as the new president. This is the first public broadcasting president to be appointed through the National Recommendation Committee, and he is scheduled to be officially appointed at the general shareholders' meeting on the 14th.

After a presidential candidate policy presentation, the visiting team of MBC's major shareholders and the corporate affairs committee narrowed down two candidates, Lee Seong-ju and Jeon Dong-geon, to the final candidates for the next MBC president. The visiting team will confirm the nominees through a final interview on the 13th.

The Broadcasting Media and Communications Standards Commission issued a 'warning' to Far East Broadcasting's broadcast of one-sided claims, and a 'caution' to nine advertisements that misled Chinese kimchi into being domestically produced and Hyundai Home Shopping's broadcast of a false statement that a sale was imminent.