
The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the upper court, which rejected the request to stop the screening of the movie 'Iki Gözüm Ahmet', which tells the life of the artist Ahmet Kaya.
The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the upper court, which rejected the request to stop the screening of the movie 'Iki Gözüm Ahmet', which tells the life of Ahmet Kaya, on the grounds that the family's consent was not obtained and their personal rights were harmed.
AI-generated summary
Ahmet Kaya's family initiated a legal process on the grounds that their approval was not received for the film, which was planned to be released in 2020.
A new decision has been made in the legal process initiated by the family of the artist Ahmet Kaya due to the movie 'My Two Eyes Ahmet', which tells about his life. The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the upper court rejecting the request to stop the screening of the film.
Ahmet Kaya's family appealed to the judiciary, stating that the film, which was planned to be released in 2020, was prepared without their approval.
The family requested an interim injunction to prevent the screening of the film.
THE SUPREME COURT REJECTED THE REQUEST FOR MEASURES
Upon application, an interim injunction was initially issued against the film, but the Istanbul Civil Court of First Instance later lifted this measure.
The artist's wife and songwriter Gülten Kaya objected to the decision and took the file to the higher court.
Istanbul Regional Court of Justice rejected the request for interim injunction on the grounds that the film was an anonymous work.
THE SUPREME COURT REVERSED THE DECISION
According to the news of Sabah newspaper, the Supreme Court, which examined the file, overturned the decision of the Regional Court of Justice.
In the decision, it was pointed out that the film about Ahmet Kaya's life was prepared without the consent of his family and that fictional people and events related to the artist's private life were used in the production.
The Supreme Court evaluated that there was no superior public interest that would justify filming the artist's private life.
It was also emphasized that the fictional scenes in the film harmed the personal rights of Kaya's family and that the right to respect for private life should be respected.
THE CASE WILL BE HELD AGAIN
Following the Supreme Court's reversal decision, the case regarding the movie 'Iki Gözüm Ahmet' will be reconsidered in the Istanbul Civil Court of First Instance.
The legal dispute regarding the screening of the film will be evaluated in the retrial.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The case will be heard again at the Istanbul Civil Court of First Instance.
Very likely · Within months

After the Constitutional Court annulled the phrase indefinite alimony, AKP decided to expand its regulatory work. In the process where the opinions of women's associations and lawyers will be taken, it is planned that the duration of alimony will be tied to criteria.

In the lawsuit filed against Meta and Snap in the US state of California, two young people claim that the addictive designs of the platforms harm their mental health. Names such as Zuckerberg and Spiegel are expected to be heard as witnesses.

The Constitutional Court annulled the grant of indefinite alimony to the divorced spouse and gave 9 months to the Turkish Grand National Assembly. The types of measures, poverty, participation and aid alimony applied in Türkiye and their payment conditions have come to the fore again.

120 people who participated in the protests following the detention of Ekrem İmamoğlu in Istanbul were acquitted by the court. The court stated that there was no ban on demonstrations on the day of the incident and there was no criminal element.
Doctor Nurettin Demirkol, who was tried for 'false testimony' regarding the suspicious death of former Minister of Transport Arif Ahmet Denizolgun, was sentenced to 2 years and 6 months in prison. Since the defendant was over 65 years old, it was decided to postpone his sentence and release him.

Necati Özkan, who has been detained for a year on charges of political espionage, claimed in the letter he wrote from prison that the digital data in the indictment was invalid, that IMM records refuted the accusations and that the trial process was unlawful.