
AI-generated summary
A former Open AI safety employee publicly expressed concerns about AI safety issues after leaving the company, criticizing companies for focusing only on improving performance and lacking safety measures.
(Los Angeles = Yonhap News) Correspondent Kim Kyung-yoon = Amid concerns that artificial intelligence (AI) could destroy humanity, a former Open AI employee publicly pointed out that the company is not making enough efforts to ensure safety.
David Robinson, a former Open AI safety employee, wrote a contribution to The Atlantic on the 3rd (local time), saying, "I agree with the opinions of other recent retirees that companies building this technology (AI) are not being cautious enough," and pointed out that safety measures across the AI industry are lax.
Robinson criticized, “Open AI has grown through a trial-and-error method that improves guardrails (safety devices) when a problem is found,” adding, “This method assumes periodic failures, and as the system becomes more powerful, the size of the failure increases.”
The technology has been developed by first distributing an AI model with improved performance and then fixing it little by little when problems arise.
The problem is that AI performance has improved incomparably compared to before.
Robinson said AI models are starting to improve their ability to detect tests and have the potential to fool developers by behaving differently during testing and deployment.
He also pointed out that the industry as a whole is ignoring safety issues because it is only focusing on development speed, and that there is a “vague optimism that problems can be solved at any time if they arise.”
“This environment is not the place to grow AI that could be smarter than us and may not work the way we want,” he said. “AI companies must operate like nuclear power plants, with layers of redundancy and careful planning.”
Robinson worked at OpenAI for three and a half years and was one of the company's longest-tenured employees, overseeing the preparation of safety reports, but recently resigned.
In relation to this, Open AI explained that it is preparing sufficient safety measures.
An OpenAI official said, "We ensure that model performance does not exceed the range we can safely control," and added, "When we need to slow down, we stop training or hold off on model release."
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Open AI and other AI companies will increase safety investments and external audits
Likely · Within months
AI safety-related regulatory discussions will accelerate
Possible · Within months

According to the Epoch AI report, AI inference costs are falling by about 47% per quarter, or one-third of the cost per year, which is four times faster than DNA analysis. The cost of OpenAI's 'o3' model was 30 cents per doctoral level exam question, but after 18 months, the cost of 'GPT-5.6 Luna' was reduced to 0.04 cents, 1 in 725.

As personal information leaks continue to occur in communication, distribution, and online platforms, as well as OTT, payment, beauty platforms, and major commercial banks, sensitive life information such as name and contact information, as well as income, loan limit, and consultation and treatment information, is being exposed. In particular, recent banking incidents have raised the possibility of attacks using artificial intelligence, raising concerns that if leaked information is combined, it could lead to secondary damage such as customized phishing.

South Korea's National Court Administration reported 239,145 hacking attempts targeting the court network from January to August 2024, a 2.4-fold increase from 101,205 cases in the same period last year, with March recording the highest monthly total at 48,263 attempts.

As AI competition moves beyond answers to the AI agent stage that performs actual work, domestic companies such as KT, Raon Secure, and LG U+ are rapidly expanding the scope of AI use to the fields of work automation, security, lightweighting, and scientific research.

From January to August of this year, there were 239,145 hacking attempts targeting the court computer network, which is 1.7 times the total number of incidents last year, with the highest monthly number of 48,263 in March. The National Court Administration submitted the data to the National Assembly, and as a result of its own audit of personal information leaks due to past hacking incidents, it was found that measures such as severe admonitions were taken.

There are repeated warnings that the pace of artificial intelligence (AI) development must be controlled, but the battle for AI development is actually accelerating due to the competition for hegemony between the US and China and the desire for survival among companies.