
A survey of 2,500 students reveals widespread use of chatbots in learning, but a lack of school guidelines and concerns about future skills.
AI-generated summary
The survey was conducted by the Youth and Work Observatory of Skuola.net and Gi Edu on a sample of 2,500 high school students.
The "Youth and Work" Observatory of Skuola.net and Gi Edu, which involved 2,500 high school students at the end of the last school year, reveals how 8 out of 10 children use chatbots in their studies, but only 1 in 6 have received official instructions or guidelines from the school on how to do so.
Among students, there are those who have integrated them into their daily study routine (21%), those (37%) who use them regularly but only for specific subjects, or (24%) only to deal with the most difficult situations. The survey highlights that children behave like already advanced users who almost always check the sources and correctness of the answers provided by the AI. The most common case of use, for 2 out of 3 students, is the one in which they question the AI to get simpler explanations of complex concepts. This is then followed by the synthesis of texts to develop study aids, such as concept maps or podcasts to listen to (46%), the request for ideas to construct papers (24%) or study plans (10%) as well as exercise proposals in the form of quizzes and questions to check preparation (32%). However, there is no shortage of those who use chatbots as a shortcut: to correct texts developed independently (22%), to solve tasks for them (20%), to translate texts into a foreign language (17%).
Only 24% of students say they have improved grades since they can prepare with artificial intelligence, while all the others have seen their academic performance unchanged (25%) or even worsened (6%). Furthermore, as many as 73% answer affirmatively to the question "Are you afraid that by using AI too much you might lose the ability to do things without it?" and 18% confirm that this has already happened.
As regards the relationship of teachers with artificial intelligence tools, only 19% of students define teachers' attitude towards AI as predominantly open. It is no coincidence that only 7% said they had the opportunity to use it often in class and with different teachers, while it happened to all the others rarely (29%) if ever, with the aggravating circumstance that in 22% of cases the teachers, in addition to ignoring the teaching of these tools, strictly prohibited their use. The majority of teachers tolerate AI (49%) or pretend nothing happens (12%), and there is no shortage of those who repress and threaten sanctions to violators (20%). Meanwhile, in the absence of official rules (50%) or at most vague and confusing indications on how to use AI at school (28%), the students' request is unanimous: train teachers (38%), include it as a transversal discipline in all subjects (20%), give clear rules on how to use it (20%) or offer access to the most advanced paid models (7%).

Today 1,800 Italian high schools joined the strike against cuts to education, while in Paris thousands of young people, including the Italian activist Eva in Erasmus, blocked boulevards and participated in a strike of 60,000 people, denouncing police violence, disproportionate use of tear gas and degraded school conditions in banlieues similar to those in Italy.

In Paris, a peaceful student demonstration to demand more resources and school staff, the repeal of Parcoursup and the renovation of buildings was interrupted by clashes with hundreds of black blocs who threw stones and cones at the police, causing injuries and damage.

In Italy, the costs of nursery schools vary considerably between municipalities: for families with ISEE up to 15 thousand euros, the total monthly expense (fee and canteen) ranges from 60 euros in Mantua to 553 euros in Belluno; for Isee up to 25 thousand euros, from 100 euros in Catanzaro to 645 euros in Udine. The confederal secretary of the Uil, Santo Biondo, denounces the missed opportunity of the Pnrr and calls for structural investments to reduce territorial inequalities in access to educational services for early childhood.

The government has increased the resources for the total or partial free of charge of textbooks and established a fund of 20 million euros per year from 2027 for families with ISEE up to 40,000 euros, while the book bonus remains at 20 million but has also been extended to first and third grade students. However, consumer associations report that the increases in school book prices, combined with the 'recommended' book strategy, are causing families' spending to rise above the official ceilings, reaching up to 1,300 euros per student, and are calling for the extension of the 19% personal income tax deduction for documented purchases of school supplies.

The Ministry of Education has published the list of 6,342 schools benefiting from an extraordinary fund of almost 20 million for air conditioning. Each will receive 3,153 euros, but unions and oppositions criticize the reduced amount per chamber and the timing.

The President of the Republic signed the school decree approved by the Council of Ministers on 24 September, published in the Official Journal and in force from 1 October. From 2027/28, the provision introduces a 30% ceiling for foreign students not born in Italy and with little knowledge of Italian, with exceptions for those who attended nursery school. 3.4 million have been allocated for 2027 and 14.1 million for 2028 for language enhancement courses. The ban on access to school with a misrepresented face and the Cpia courses for parents of pupils in difficulty have also been confirmed, with fines of 200 to 1,000 euros for violators. The decree now passes to the Senate for conversion into law.