
The S leader wants to avoid a third prime ministerial vote in the near future and calls for more time for reflection in the formation of the government.
AI-generated summary
The Riksdag has carried out two unsuccessful prime ministerial votes. A total of four votes can be held before a special election is called.
On Monday, the S leader was in contact with the speaker of the Riksdag, Andreas Norlén.
- I told him that the best thing for the process now would be if he went out and told me that he does not intend to have a third prime ministerial vote on Ulf Kristersson (M), unless it is the case that Kristersson has secured a majority for a government basis, Andersson says.
She is now prepared to take on a probe mission, she says.
- Yes, it is the speaker who decides if he wants to give it, but if he asks me to take on a probe mission, then of course I will.
She is open to having a parallel probe mission with Kristersson, which was the case for a period during the formation of the government in 2018.
The Riksdag has so far held two prime ministerial votes, one on Andersson and one on C leader Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist, both of which have failed. Two remain before Sweden goes to extra elections.
According to Andersson, a combination of time pressure and time for reflection is now needed to get ahead in the formation of a government.
- I judge in this situation that there is too much time pressure and too little time for reflection.
- I don't think we should have a third vote anytime soon.
When asked if a third prime ministerial vote is not needed to get the parties moving, Andersson replies:
- My assessment is that things are moving now and you shouldn't make decisions in a panic either.
Andersson announced on Sunday that she wants to form a government consisting of S, C and MP and to have close cooperation with V. She denies reports that S promised the Left Party ministerial positions in internal talks with the red-green parties.
- Yes, there are rumors that we would have made demands on the Center Party that the Left Party must absolutely sit in the government. That has not been the case, but we have of course discussed all the different possibilities that exist. But we have made no such demands on the Center Party and we have made no promises.
The S leader says that she continues to have talks with all the parties in the red-green majority.
- I had that yesterday and I will have that today too.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Magdalena Andersson continues talks with red-green parties.
Very likely · Within days
Jönköping is one of the regions where the Left Party does not back down from the government's demand. District chairman Kristoffer Wolke states that the requirement is to sit in government and puts the responsibility on the Center Party.

Shortly before the SD leader Jimmie Åkesson's press conference, an anonymous account was created on Polymarket which bet over SEK 110,000 on the government issue. The account is at risk of making a large profit, raising questions about possible insider trading in unregulated forecast markets.

The Center Party demands a "total package" from both Ulf Kristersson and Magdalena Andersson regarding their government alternatives. The announcement comes after Jimmie Åkesson opened for a bourgeois four-party government with SD support.
Ida Gabrielsson's (V) statements in Aktuellt raised speculation that the Left Party has softened its demand for government participation. Despite internal anger against C and S, the party's districts are adamant that government involvement is a requirement for support.
S leader Magdalena Andersson wants to govern with the Center Party and the Green Party, with the Left Party as the support party. She appealed to V to think about her government demand and said that it is not about her but about the Swedish people. The Center Party has requested that both Andersson and Ulf Kristersson present their total package by Friday at the latest.
Ivo's supervision shows that 97 percent of the municipalities examined have deficiencies in child protection. Nearly nine out of ten need to improve the handling of reports of concern, and two out of three lack checks before children are placed in family homes or privately run facilities. The supervision will be followed up.