
The US Supreme Court has set the oral hearing date on the App Store dispute between Apple and Epic Games as January 11, 2027.
AI-generated summary
A legal struggle has been going on between Apple and Epic Games for a long time over App Store commissions and rules.
The hearing date of the US Supreme Court in the App Store dispute between Apple and Epic Games has been announced.
According to the court's records dated November 2, the oral hearing in file number 25-1311 will be held on January 11, 2027.
The determined date does not mean a decision on the outcome of the case. While the stage at which the parties will present their oral opinions before the court has become clear, there is no separate calendar yet for when the final decision will be announced.
THE COURT ACCEPTED THE APPLICATION IN JUNE
The file was brought before the US Supreme Court upon Apple's application.
The court agreed to review Apple's application on June 30. However, the admission decision did not cover all the legal questions in the application.
The Supreme Court decided to examine only the first question in the petition.
Apple submitted its opinion on the merits to the court on September 14. The deadline for Epic Games to submit its response has been extended until November 13, 2026.
THE REVIEW DOES NOT COVER ALL RULES OF THE APP STORE
The issue that the Supreme Court will consider does not mean a re-examination of the App Store's entire commercial rules or commission system.
The first question the court considered focused on whether a party could be sanctioned for acting contrary to the “spirit” of the decision for conduct that was not expressly prohibited by the court order.
At the center of the dispute is the extent to which the behavior in question must be prohibited clearly and unambiguously in the decision in order to determine its violation of the court decision.
THE SECOND QUESTION WAS EXCLUDED FROM REVIEW
Although there was a second legal question in Apple's application, the Supreme Court did not examine this part.
For this reason, it is not expected that all claims regarding the App Store will be re-evaluated at the hearing on January 11.
The court will hear the parties' views only on the first legal question it accepts.
APP STORE RULES WILL NOT CHANGE ON JANUARY 11
The announcement of the hearing date does not mean that the App Store commission rates or the rules regarding the payment system will directly change on January 11.
In order to determine the possible consequences for developers and users, the Supreme Court's final decision will first need to be announced, and then it will be necessary to clarify how the decision will be applied to the case file.
At this stage of the legal struggle between Apple and Epic Games, which has been going on for years, all eyes are on the oral hearing to be held on January 11, 2027.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The oral hearing will be held on January 11, 2027.
Very likely · Within months

In a case heard in Eskişehir, the Supreme Court found the personal relationship duration of grandparents with their grandchildren insufficient and decided that they should stay together for longer periods of time during live-in visits and holidays for the best interest of the child.

The Constitutional Court opened the way for a retrial by deciding that the right of Eğitim-Sen member Cafer Sevgül, who received an administrative fine for attending a press conference held in Tunceli in 2016, was violated.

In the second hearing of the case where 15 students who protested Nureddin Yıldız's invitation to Boğaziçi University were tried, 7 police officers filed a complaint against the students.

In Russia, the Taganskiy District Court fined Google 3.8 million rubles and Telegram 14.6 million rubles for not removing banned content.
The Taganskiy District Court in Moscow decided to impose a fine of 14.6 million rubles on Telegram and 3.8 million rubles on Google for not removing banned content.

US citizens who consult artificial intelligence chatbots to avoid paying attorney fees in divorce and custody cases face major financial and legal damages in the courts due to fake precedent decisions and false petitions.