ArXiv is an electronic archive of scientific preprints. For over three decades, it has enabled scientists to quickly share research results before their official publication. Texts can only be placed there by registered and trusted authors (endorsers). To become a trusted author, all you need is confirmation from another trusted author.
The increase in artificial intelligence capabilities has made generating scientific articles extremely simple and fast. As a result, the number of submitted works is growing at an alarming rate. In September 2024, 20,569 articles were submitted to arXiv, a year later 26,646, and in September 2026 this number reached a record 40,363 submissions. Such a rapid increase means that website moderators are overloaded, and authentic, valuable works are lost in the flood of texts created by algorithms.
Quality and understanding issues
Mathematicians point out that many of the new articles generated by artificial intelligence are of low substantive value. While some of them may contain correct solutions to known problems, they are often written in a crude way that is difficult for humans to understand. Kevin Buzzard from Imperial College London admits that browsing all new works every day has become impossible without the support of AI tools that help select the most valuable ones.
The problem is that provisional articles don't explain things well. It's not just about correctness; it's about human understanding, and artificial intelligence is sometimes very bad at it, Buzzard emphasizes.
New challenges for the scientific community
Artificial intelligence has also enabled people outside the scientific community to generate articles on mathematical topics that were previously the preserve of specialists. Thanks to this, even people without advanced education can solve difficult problems and publish their results on arXiv. However, such works are often criticized by professional mathematicians who accuse them of lacking depth and understanding of the topic.
Chaim Goodman-Strauss of the University of Arkansas cites an example of an article that, although it contained a correct solution to a long-unsolved problem, was described as "essentially provisional." In turn, Terence Tao from the University of California, Los Angeles, points out that mass publication of mathematical discoveries without proper context and explanation may harm the entire field.
Attempts to save the website
One of the key challenges is verifying the correctness of solutions generated by AI. The formalization process, which involves mathematically proving the correctness of solutions, requires trust in both the tools and the people using them. This further complicates the situation, especially when the number of new jobs increases exponentially.
To limit the flow of low-quality articles, arXiv has introduced new limits for authors. Currently, each user can submit a maximum of two articles per month and have no more than three active submissions at any one time. Additionally, although the use of artificial intelligence is permitted, authors must clearly indicate this in their works.
However, the website recorded an increase in the number of articles with a narrow thematic scope and low scientific value. In response to these challenges, new initiatives have been created, such as the Hexagon website, which collects the so-called “pre-preprints” – AI-generated articles that still require further verification and understanding by the scientific community.
