Australia assists US investigation into missing F-35 parts diverted to Hong Kong
Quick Look
- Australia is helping the US investigate how unserviceable F-35 components shipped from Australia to the US were mistakenly diverted to Hong Kong earlier this year, with the parts still unaccounted for.
- Defense Minister Richard Marles confirmed the collaboration with US authorities and Lockheed Martin, stating the missing parts were not sensitive, though the incident highlights ongoing supply chain vulnerabilities in the F-35 program.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
The F-35 is a US-made fifth-generation stealth fighter operated by the US and its allies, with 12 countries currently flying the aircraft. The program has faced years of cost growth, maintenance issues, spare-parts shortages, and difficulties meeting readiness targets.
Australia is helping the US investigate how parts for the F-35 stealth fighter program went missing after being mistakenly diverted to the wrong destination, Defense Minister Richard Marles has confirmed.
The incident occurred earlier this year, when a shipment of unserviceable F-35 components from Australia that was bound for the US was unexpectedly rerouted to Hong Kong. The parts, which were being transported by a third-party company on behalf of manufacturer Lockheed Martin, remain unaccounted for months later. Politico first reported the incident last week.
Marles said on Tuesday that Canberra was working with the US and Lockheed Martin to examine its role in the incident, stressing that the missing components were not sensitive.
Marles did not elaborate on why the components were considered non-sensitive and, when pressed by a journalist, said the question was best directed to the US and Lockheed Martin. Politico reported that the shipment included an F-35 canopy incorporating radar-resistant technology, although it remains unclear exactly which canopy components were involved.
The F-35 is a US-made fifth-generation stealth fighter operated by the US and its allies, with 12 countries currently flying the aircraft from bases on their own territory.
The Pentagon’s F-35 Joint Program Office has acknowledged a “shipment issue” involving unserviceable components to the news outlet and said it is working with US authorities and industry partners to recover the parts. The House Armed Services Committee is also examining the case, while Pentagon and State Department officials reportedly began briefing congressional staff on it in June.
The incident has highlighted potential vulnerabilities in the F-35’s sprawling global supply chain. Spare parts are routinely shipped between military bases, regional warehouses, and repair facilities, with Lockheed Martin overseeing much of the network on behalf of the Pentagon. Commercial carriers and other contractors are also used to transport components internationally.
F-35 parts have gone missing before. According to a US Government Accountability Office (GAO) report released in May 2023, one of the F-35 program’s prime contractors had recorded losses of more than 1 million spare parts worth over $85 million since May 2018, including components that were lost, damaged, or destroyed. The F-35 Joint Program Office had reviewed fewer than 2% of those cases. GAO also found that the military lacked its own comprehensive system for tracking the location, quantity, and cost of parts held in the contractor-managed global pool.
The inventory problems are part of broader difficulties that have dogged the F-35, the Pentagon’s largest weapons program. The aircraft has faced years of cost growth, maintenance and spare-parts shortages, upgrade delays, and persistent difficulties meeting Pentagon readiness targets.
What to Watch
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The US House Armed Services Committee will release findings on the F-35 parts diversion incident.
Likely · Within weeks
Lockheed Martin and the F-35 Joint Program Office will implement improved tracking measures for spare parts.
Possible · Within months
Open Questions
- Why were the F-35 components considered non-sensitive despite incorporating radar-resistant technology?
- Who is responsible for the diversion of the shipment to Hong Kong?
- What steps are being taken to prevent similar incidents in the F-35 supply chain?





