The husband, who was suspended for 25 months in 2 years during the divorce process, applied to the Constitutional Court

Ç.E., who lives in Istanbul, filed for divorce in 2021 from V.E., to whom she has been married for 19 years and is the father of her 2 children. During the divorce case, Ç.E. applied to the court and requested protection measures 8 times for her husband, V.E, within the scope of the "Law No. 6284 on the Protection of the Family and Prevention of Violence against Women". The Family Court, where the divorce case was ongoing, accepted all protective measures and issued a restraining order against V.E.

A 25-month protection order was issued against V.E, with a total of 8 decisions, within 2 years, starting from September 14, 2021, until July 13, 2023. V.E objected to every decision, but his objections were rejected. V.E, whose all objections were rejected by the court, applied to the Constitutional Court as a last resort.

V.E's lawyer, Levent Karakoç, stated in his petition to the Constitutional Court that Ç.E's applications for protection measures were accepted on the same day without being examined. Stating that V.E.'s objections were rejected without even the minimum justification, Karakoç stated that protection orders were taken at 3-month intervals and that during this period, his client was prevented from communicating with his 2 children, who were underage at that time.

Lawyer Levent Karakoç, who stated that the precautionary decisions were made unfairly and unlawfully, said, "All decisions were written as a template decision. Because the same decisions were always given without examining the situation between the parties and without examining our petitions of objection that we submitted against all these decisions. Calling our client "Defective" in the content of the decision is against the procedure and the law. The justification is insufficient. The right is being abused. It is a violation of constitutional rights. The decisions given continuously by the local court without a new fact are against the procedure and the law. Our Constitution "It is clear that the right to a fair trial and the right to a reasoned decision, guaranteed under Article 36, have been violated," he said.