
New regulations make it easier to claim compensation for accident victims in e-scooter incidents
AI-generated summary
Until now, claiming compensation was difficult because injured parties had to identify the driver. E-scooters were exempt from strict liability rules for motor vehicles.
In the event of accidents involving e-scooters, their owners can also be held responsible in the future. The Federal Council approved a bill from the Federal Ministry of Justice. The new regulations are intended to make it easier for accident victims to claim compensation.
The new regulations not only apply if, for example, a passer-by is hit by an electric scooter. Even if someone trips over an improperly parked e-scooter and injures themselves, the law should apply in the future.
Previously, the rule applied in such cases was that the injured party had to prove who drove the scooter - which can be difficult if the scooter was rented anonymously. The injured parties were often left with the cost of treatment because electric scooters were exempt from the strict liability rules for motor vehicles. In the future, victims can contact the owner, who will have to pay for the damage. Liability applies regardless of whether the owner is personally at fault for an accident. For rental e-scooters, the owner is usually the rental company.
Significantly more accidents with e-scooters
The federal government justified the law by saying that rental companies earn money by renting out e-scooters - and should therefore also bear the liability risk. The Federal Council sees it that way too.
The number of accidents involving e-scooters has increased significantly in Germany in recent years. According to the Federal Statistical Office, there were almost 16,500 accidents with injuries or deaths nationwide last year. That was 38.1 percent more than the year before.
The Dortmund public prosecutor's office is investigating a 105-year-old for aiding and abetting multiple murders. The accused is said to have worked as a guard in the Stalag 326 prisoner of war camp in Stukenbrock-Senne during the Second World War.
The Neustadt an der Weinstraße administrative court has dismissed the lawsuits brought by the city of Pirmasens and the district of Südwestpfalz against the municipal financial equalization of the state of Rhineland-Palatinate. The municipalities wanted to clarify the constitutionality of the distribution of funds.
On Friday, the Federal Court of Justice announced a decision in the legal dispute over a street art project on a high-rise building in Wuppertal. An apartment owner is suing against the majority decision of the owners' association to decorate the north facade of the building with a large-format painting. He fears fundamental changes, an increase in visitors and the impossibility of installing air conditioning. The other side cites the 2024 resolution and the difficulty of achieving unanimity in large ownership associations.

A car buyer demanded over 122,000 euros in compensation for loss of use for a vehicle that was classified as not roadworthy, but which he continued to drive. The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court decided that there is no claim as long as the car is actually used, as there is no economic disadvantage.
The European Court of Justice has declared the Federal Court of Justice's three-year objection period against ineffective energy price increases to be incompatible with EU law. Customers no longer have to tacitly accept ineffective increases after three years. The Berlin Court of Appeal will now hear the case again.
The Federal Constitutional Court has temporarily lifted the detention for the left-wing extremist Lina E. The Dresden Higher Regional Court ordered her detention in June because she refused to testify as a witness in the Antifa East trial.