
AI-generated summary
Former professor Tan has been indicted on charges of spreading false information about President Lee Jae-myung, and former professor Tan is denying the jurisdiction of the Korean court, citing that he made the remarks in the United States.
“There is no purpose to recognize false facts or slander”… Indictment dismissed, not guilty claimed
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Bitna Kim = Former Liberty University professor Mos Tan (Korean name Dan Hyun-myeong), who was sent to trial on charges of defaming President Lee Jae-myung, appealed the unfairness of filing the indictment in the first trial, saying that Korea had no jurisdiction.
On the 16th, Judge Heo Seo-yoon of the Seoul Central District Court's Criminal Division 17 held the first trial for former Professor Tan, who was indicted on charges of defamation under the Information and Communications Network Act and defamation under the Criminal Act.
Former Professor Tan is accused of spreading false information at a press conference held in Washington, D.C. last year, saying, "President Lee was involved in a gang rape and murder case when he was a teenager and was imprisoned in a juvenile detention center."
The defense attorney sought dismissal of the indictment, arguing that the Korean court does not have jurisdiction, citing the fact that former Professor Tan, a U.S. citizen, made problematic remarks in the United States.
He then emphasized, “Even if jurisdiction was recognized, it did not state false facts, and there was no perception that it was false,” and “there was no purpose to slander.”
Former Professor Tan, who introduced himself as a social activist, also said, "I plead not guilty to the indictment," and added, "I believe the information regarding President Lee is true."
Even after finishing the trial, former professor Tan said, "It is unfair for me, as an American citizen, to experience something like this in a Korean court," and insisted, "If you believe it to be true or speak the truth, you should be guaranteed freedom of expression."
Former Professor Tan was suspended from leaving the country for failing to comply with the police's request to appear while investigating this case, and is facing his first trial in the appellate court after losing the first administrative lawsuit filed against him.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Seoul Central District Court will decide whether to dismiss the indictment after reviewing Professor Tan's jurisdictional dissent claim.
Possible · Within weeks

In the appeal trial of Mr. Kim, a man in his 40s, who was indicted on charges of calling the May 18 Democratization Movement a riot, the Daegu District Court's Criminal Appeal Division 2-3 overturned the original trial's sentence of a fine of 1 million won and declared him not guilty. The court ruled that the defendant's actions were reprehensible, but that writing 'riot' did not state facts but rather posted opinions.

The appeal trial ruling on former President Yoon Seok-yeol's charge of being the leader of the rebellion is expected to be handed down as early as this year. The Seoul High Court plans to complete its final statement of opinion around November 5 and set a sentencing date.

The Ministry of Intellectual Property announced on the 14th that it is seeking to revise the Judicial Police Service Act to expand the scope of investigation by the technology police from infringement of existing trade secrets to crimes of leakage of national core technologies and national advanced strategic technologies.

South Korea's Supreme Court overturned an appellate ruling that had sentenced 81-year-old shaman Sim to seven years in prison for her niece's death during a ritual, stating the possibility of intent to kill should not have been ruled out and sending the case back to the Seoul High Court.

Bloomberg reported that Antropic requested a retrial in response to a federal appeals court's ruling rejecting the U.S. Department of Defense's designation as a "supply chain risk company." This legal battle began with the breakdown of negotiations with the U.S. military over the control of safety devices for AI technology, and the Department of Defense opposes restrictions on the use of the technology on national security grounds.

The BBC has asked the court to force President Trump to appear in a recorded testimony in a $10 billion damages lawsuit filed against him. President Trump announced his absence due to pending national affairs, and is scheduled to discuss whether to compel the recording of testimony at the federal district court in Florida on the 22nd.