
US President Donald Trump said that he does not intend to use nuclear weapons against Iran, but he pointed to the possibility of using the MOAB bomb, known as the “Mother of All Bombs,” to target Iranian energy infrastructure and nuclear facilities, in the context of new military plans being prepared before or after the midterm elections, with doubts about its effectiveness and warnings about its impact on civilians.
AI-generated summary
Trump's statement comes more than six months after the US bombing of Iran, and in the absence of a negotiated settlement, with Republicans preparing for potential political repercussions in the upcoming midterm elections.
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he does not intend to use nuclear weapons against Iran.
Trump added, during an interview with Newsmax: “I will not use nuclear weapons, we don’t need that.”
The American President mentioned about the GBU-43/B bomb, known as “MOAB” or “Mother of All Bombs”, which is the largest non-nuclear bomb in the American arsenal: “It is not nuclear at all, but rather it is just a very huge bomb; more like a miniature nuclear bomb, but the mother of all bombs is one big bomb, not nuclear.”
Trump's statements came after sources revealed to CNN that the US military has prepared new plans to launch strikes - which may include using the "mother of all bombs" to target Iranian energy infrastructure and nuclear facilities for the first time in the conflict, in the event that Trump issues an order to resume combat operations, whether before or after the midterm elections.
This will represent a remarkable escalation, although there are doubts about its effectiveness in achieving any of the strategic goals announced by Trump or in tipping the scales of the war.
Trump is facing pressure to end this war, which enjoys widespread popular opposition, at a time when Republicans are preparing to face possible political repercussions from voters in the upcoming midterm elections, and with the absence of any significant indications that a negotiated settlement between the two countries is imminent, after more than 6 months of American bombing.
While the US military continues to provide Trump with options to launch potential strikes against remaining Iranian targets, some officials are still wondering - privately - whether the White House has a strategy that integrates these plans within a framework that can actually end the war. This is something that only the president has the authority to do.
For months, Trump and his advisors discussed options that might constitute a “decisive” end to the war - at least from a media and marketing perspective - because they were aware of the extent of American popular dissatisfaction with this conflict.
Although some figures in the US administration described the war as having actually been decided in favor of the United States, Trump was more cautious in his recent statements. He avoided declaring victory and merely said that there were tasks that had not yet been completed for the United States in that country.
Behind the scenes, Trump also expressed skepticism about the opinions of some allies outside the administration who urged him to be satisfied with withdrawing American forces into the country and move forward. Trump believes that such a step would look like a defeat.
Over the past few weeks, White House advisers have been holding meetings to discuss various options for dealing with Iran. While Trump has publicly announced that he will not take new measures before the midterm elections, several advisers have said privately that they do not know whether this statement is final or if it may change before Election Day.
One source told CNN that Trump ordered the military to prepare additional plans for strikes against Iranian targets - including "a lot of energy infrastructure" - with the possibility of using a MOAB bomb. The same source noted that the wording used stipulated that this attack would take place "before the US withdrawal from the Central Command area of responsibility," suggesting that the administration might launch additional strikes, try to declare victory, and then quickly withdraw its forces.
A second source also told CNN that military plans to strike Iranian nuclear facilities - including the Ax Mountain site - also explicitly call for the use of a MOAB bomb, and Trump has repeatedly threatened in recent months to strike the Ax Mountain site - where the United States and Israel believe Tehran stores components of its nuclear program - even after suspending comprehensive combat operations earlier this year, as Trump continues to stress that his goal is to ensure that Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon.
Another US official noted that when developing military plans, the military prepares a menu of options for decision makers that range from low to high levels of intensity. The official added that more fortified targets - including those located deep underground - require larger bombs, and the MOAB bomb is the largest of its kind.
However, there are questions about the effectiveness of the MOAB bomb as a munition used against Iranian nuclear facilities and other sites located deep underground. Although this GPS-guided bomb is capable of destroying an area equivalent to nine city blocks, it likely lacks the ability to penetrate deep enough below the surface to destroy suspected nuclear facilities at the Ax Mountain site, which is believed to be fortified by layers of granite rock, or other remaining Iranian nuclear sites, according to informed sources.
A third source familiar with Iran-related military planning discussions told CNN: “The MOAB is a massive weapon that falls under the category of ‘information operations’ (for psychological and information influence), and is excellent for clearing large areas but is not suitable for much else.” He added, “It is certainly not designed to be a deep-penetration warhead.”
The sources indicated that if used, the bomb will have devastating effects in the targeting area, but its effect will likely be limited to the superficial level. The bomb's massive explosion range will undoubtedly raise concerns about the potential for civilian casualties, especially if it is used to target Iranian infrastructure facilities located near populated areas or in close proximity to non-military sites.
However, Trump may choose to use the MOAB as a psychological weapon at a time when the Iranian regime appears to be holding its ground and unwilling to yield to its diplomatic demands. Although US officials warn that its use likely will not force Iran to surrender or achieve a strategic military victory, it may provide Trump with an additional option - without the need to resume full-scale combat operations - to change the status quo of the conflict.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Trump may order the use of the MOAB bomb against Iranian targets before or after the midterm elections
Possible · Within weeks

Israel has raised its threats to expand its occupation in southern Lebanon, hinting at adding Nabatieh and Litani to the “permanent security zone” amid anticipation of a possible confrontation with Iran and the approaching Knesset elections, coinciding with raids and bombing that targeted several southern towns.

The Saudi-led military coalition in Yemen announced the interception and destruction of a drone launched towards the eastern region of the Kingdom on Friday morning, the day after a Houthi missile attack targeted the presidential palace in Aden, while Saudi officials accused Iran of supporting the Houthis and described the attacks as war crimes, and France announced the start of implementing practical aspects of an agreement to protect Saudi oil installations.

The armed Houthi group launched air attacks on Riyadh International Airport and the headquarters of Saudi Aramco during the past week, which revealed the Kingdom’s exposure to the threats of its opponents in Yemen, at a time when it seeks to diversify its economy away from oil. Experts attribute this exposure to Iran’s support for the Houthis in achieving self-sufficiency in the production of advanced weapons, and the depletion of stocks of interceptor missiles due to the war on Iran.

Reports indicate that the United States is considering using its most powerful non-nuclear bomb, known as the “Mother of All Bombs,” against Iran if President Donald Trump decides to start a new round of escalation after the war that began in February 2026 reached a stalemate, with doubts about its effectiveness against underground nuclear facilities.

CNN reported that the United States is considering using the largest non-nuclear bomb in its military arsenal (MOAB) against Iran if President Donald Trump decides to carry out new military action, stating that the bomb targets energy infrastructure and nuclear facilities, and that its effectiveness against deep underground targets is questionable, while Trump and Netanyahu discussed the possibility of launching a broad military campaign against Iran.

The military coalition in Yemen announced a Houthi escalation against Saudi Arabia, prompting the European Union to postpone a Gulf summit in Riyadh. This coincided with reports of US military plans against Iran and the sinking of commercial ships near the Strait of Hormuz.