
Analysts say framing domestic AI buildout as key to competing with China failed to convince Americans in midterm elections
Strong voter backlash in the US midterm elections against AI infrastructure projects, including data centres, indicates that framing the domestic buildout as key to competing with China failed to convince Americans, according to analysts Kyle Chan of Brookings Institution and Lizzi Lee of the Asia Society Policy Institute.
AI-generated summary
Analysts report strong voter backlash in the US midterm elections against AI infrastructure projects, including data centres, indicating that framing the domestic buildout as key to competing with China failed to convince Americans.
Strong voter backlash in the US midterm elections against AI infrastructure projects, including data centres, indicates that framing the domestic buildout as key to competing with China failed to convince Americans and underscores the need to address local concerns, according to analysts.
“The argument that we need to build more data centres to win in AI against China no longer seems to have the kind of resonance it did before, if it ever did, frankly,” said Kyle Chan, a fellow at the Brookings Institution’s John L. Thornton China Centre.
Lizzi Lee, a fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, echoed that assessment, saying: “The lesson is that invoking China as a justification for tech and industrial investment is becoming less effective.”
In the U.S. midterm elections, the Democratic Party regained control of the House and Senate, flipping several Senate seats in traditional Republican areas such as Texas. Elon Musk’s $474 million in political donations failed to change the election. Trump said he would be "Mr. No" and veto Democratic bills, foreshadowing an epic political confrontation in the next two years.

Taipei mayoral candidate of the Democratic Progressive Party Shen Boyang criticized Mayor Chiang Wanan for "questioning T and answering K" on the issue of child abuse, transferring the Taipei issue to Kaohsiung, and accused Chiang of spreading rumors and spreading false information. He believed that the issue of child abuse should be responded to head-on rather than claiming that Taipei is doing the best.

In an exclusive interview with Vision, Taipei mayoral candidate Shen Boyang of the Democratic Progressive Party said that Taipei City has a serious child abuse problem and may be the worst among the six cities. However, he admitted that without data he could only speculate. The current mayor Jiang Wanan criticized his figures for errors and said that municipal issues cannot be guessed out of thin air. The campaign offices of both parties subsequently fought back against each other. The focus of the dispute was the comparison of data on "child abuse at home" and "child abuse outside the home" and the loopholes in the child protection system.

When Kuomintang legislator Ye Yuanzhi questioned TaiwanPlus, he questioned the source of the program's audience. Shen Rongqin, an associate professor at York University in Canada, criticized him for being ignorant of geopolitics and having a discriminatory mentality. The two sides then engaged in a fierce confrontation on the Internet, with Shen Rongqin accusing Ye Yuanzhi of being stubborn and lacking in legislator qualities.

After the Republican Party lost the midterm elections, U.S. Vice President Vance blamed the election defeat on the war with Iran in an attempt to distance himself from President Trump. Trump responded that Vance spoke well but defended military action. Some White House officials believed that Vance had differences with the president on foreign policy and publicly acknowledged the impact of the war on the U.S. economy.

Taipei Mayor Chiang Wanan claimed at an election debate that the food poisoning case at Baolin Tea House was handled properly, sparking anger from the victims' families. Netizens revealed that one of the victims in the case was seriously ill and left behind a two-year-old son. They also questioned the city government's failure to recover a fine of 3.5 million yuan and Jiang Wanan's repeated absences from food safety meetings. They criticized him for treating the tragedy as a political achievement and adding salt to the wound.