Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai cancelled the interim relief after finding evidence of Imam interacting with media personnel.
AI-generated summary
Sharjeel Imam is an accused in the 2020 North-East Delhi riots conspiracy case, facing charges under the UAPA and IPC. He was granted seven days of interim bail to attend a family wedding.
A court in Delhi revoked the interim bail order granted to Sharjeel Imam, one of the accused in the 2020 North-East Delhi riots large conspiracy case, on Saturday following allegations against him for violating the condition that forbade him from coming into contact with media personnel.
The decision was passed by Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai on an application filed by the prosecution seeking cancellation of Imam’s interim bail.
The prosecution argued that he had breached the terms and conditions imposed by the court while granting him temporary relief.
According to the application submitted to the court, the prosecution relied on videos circulating on YouTube and the social media platform X, which allegedly showed Imam in the presence of media personnel during his interim bail period.
The prosecution alleged that Imam violated these conditions by being present in the room where a journalist interviewed his brother. After examining the videos, the court observed that Imam was sitting in the same room during the interview, and held that this amounted to a violation of the bail condition.
Rejecting the defence’s argument that the video was a compilation of separate clips and that Imam was not present during the interview, the court also said the footage indicated that the clips had been recorded in the same room at approximately the same time.
Meanwhile, the defence further maintained that Imam had neither given an interview nor interacted with any media person. It argued that the interview had been given by his brother, who was not bound by the conditions imposed on Imam.
The matter concerns the FIR that was lodged regarding the riots that occurred in North-East Delhi in the month of February 2020. Imam is one of the accused persons who have been charged under UAPA and other sections of the IPC in the conspiracy case.
The court had granted Imam interim bail for seven days, from October 4 to 10, to attend his cousin’s wedding. The September 22 order granting him relief, however, prohibited him from using social media and interacting with media persons.
Following the cancellation of his interim bail, the court directed Imam to surrender in jail by Saturday evening. His counsel has submitted that Imam had already boarded a flight and would reach Delhi to surrender.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Imam to surrender to jail authorities.
Very likely · Within hours
Ratna Singh, legal affairs head of Cockroach Janta Party, filed a plea in a Delhi court seeking an FIR against police personnel for allegedly confining her and preventing her from joining a lawyers' protest in New Delhi.
The Supreme Court ordered authorities not to impose a blanket ban on Delhi metro and train services ahead of a planned CJP protest, ruling that public transport can be regulated but not completely halted.
The Supreme Court Bar Association urged the Chief Justice of India to intervene following the detention of lawyers by Delhi Police during a protest march in New Delhi ahead of a Cockroach Janta Party demonstration.
A contempt petition was filed in the Supreme Court on Saturday alleging that authorities violated the court's October 9 order by closing 45 Delhi Metro stations from 9 pm Friday to 6 pm Saturday during a protest by the Cockroach Janta Party, despite directives ensuring no complete prohibition of metro and train movement into Delhi.
India's Supreme Court ruled that deletion of deceased, relocated, or duplicate names during Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls is valid, and that for Andhra Pradesh local body elections, the final voter list available on the election notification date — either post-SIR or the Jan 1, 2026 list — will be used, rejecting YSR Congress Party's plea to defer polls.
Justice Sheel Nagu recused from hearing Punjab government's appeal against a High Court order directing a CBI probe into an alleged bribe syndicate linked to the Chief Minister's OSD, after Justice Dipankar Datta noted concerns about potential controversies and external pressures on judicial impartiality.