AI-generated summary
Repeated drone sightings at German airports have triggered the commissioning of a drone detection system at BER Airport.
German air traffic control (DFS) is putting a drone detection system into operation at Berlin Brandenburg Airport (BER). This was announced by the Federal Ministry of Transport. This would allow drones to be detected early in the approach and departure areas and the responsible authorities to be informed about possible threats to air traffic. “In view of the current situation, we are acting consistently,” said Federal Transport Minister Steffen Bilger (CDU). Using such systems is an important step for the safety of air traffic.
Brandenburg's Transport Minister Robert Crumbach (SPD) said drone events could have different causes. From individual sightings or the sheer number of registered drone events, no reliable conclusions about the background and a specific threat situation could be derived. “That’s why it’s important to get reliable information as early as possible,” Crumbach continued. “The new drone detection system supports this.”
Drone sightings are increasing
According to the information, the background to the commissioning of the system is repeated drone sightings in the vicinity of German airports. The Federal Ministry of Transport is relying on the further expansion of such systems: “Over the course of the year, additional international airports will gradually be equipped with appropriate systems for the arrival and departure areas,” it said.
In the first half of 2026 alone, more drones were spotted at BER Airport than at any other German airport. According to DFS, the tower in Schönefeld registered 28 such flying objects in the six months. That was one more sighting than in the same period at Germany's largest airport in Frankfurt am Main. As a result, air traffic at BER had to be temporarily interrupted in seven cases.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Over the course of the year, additional international airports will gradually be equipped with appropriate systems for arrival and departure areas.
Very likely · Within months

US President Donald Trump announced that he would leave the supervision of artificial intelligence to the US developers themselves, despite warnings of existential risks. He claimed that a morally binding agreement on self-regulation had already been signed and that there was sufficient protection from the economic interests of companies. Industry representatives such as Dario Amodei from Anthropic, however, warn against uncontrolled AI development and fear a loss of control over the technology. Bipartisan bills to regulate AI exist, but no legislation is likely to be passed before the congressional elections in early November.

At its developer conference in San Francisco, OpenAI boss Sam Altman announced the AI agent Dots, which is intended to automate tasks, as well as the cheaper AI model Sol, which comes close to the performance of the top-of-the-line Astra model but is only a fifth of the cost. New premium subscriptions have also been introduced, including a $500 monthly plan.

US President Donald Trump has signed a voluntary self-regulation agreement for artificial intelligence with leading tech bosses, which he described as 'morally binding'. He rejected legal AI regulations in order to maintain the technological advantage over China. At the same time, he criticized AI skeptics as 'conspiracy theorists' and 'traitors', while companies like Anthropic and OpenAI warned of existential risks.

US President Trump rejected specific AI regulations, pointed to the technological advantage over China and announced a morally binding agreement with industry representatives and the possible establishment of a supervisory body for the AI industry.
US President Donald Trump announced that leading AI companies had signed a voluntary agreement to self-regulate their technology, which includes internal and external reviews. He described the obligation as morally justified by the economic interests of the companies.
US President Donald Trump plans to leave oversight of artificial intelligence to US developers themselves, despite warnings of existential risks. It relies on the economic interests of companies as a protective mechanism and provides for mutual control. Principles such as robust internal controls and external observers were agreed upon.