Since Gerhard Schröder, the SPD party leadership has changed frequently. Neither a change of direction nor new heads bring success back.
AI-generated summary
The SPD has a history of frequent leadership changes since the 2000s.
The SPD is looking for new party leaders. Once again. Long gone are the times when social democracy rested within itself and relied on stability. August Bebel was at the head of the Social Democrats for 21 years - in times of severe crisis. Willy Brandt even led his party for 23 years.
Since Gerhard Schröder's departure, however, the bosses have sometimes even changed every year. After Schröder came Franz Müntefering, after Müntefering came Matthias Platzeck, after Platzeck Kurt Beck, after Beck again Müntefering, after this Sigmar Gabriel, after Gabriel Martin Schulz, after Schulz Andrea Nahles, after Nahles Norbert Walter-Borjans and Saskia Esken, after the two Lars Klingbeil and Bärbel Bas.
Does it dawn on the comrades that they have already gone through all the characters? What characteristic is still missing that will lead to success with the voters? Whoever has been at the helm of the SPD since Schröder – the Social Democrats have neither gained momentum nor regained their self-confidence. She didn't discover the meaning and goal of her actions among any of them, ignoring the usual SPD word montages.
If the party were human and its leaders were their significant others, any outsider who heard of the masses would be concerned to consult a psychoanalyst. Even the stupidest kitchen psychologist would know: It's not your partner, it's yourself! Whether in the opposition or in the government, the SPD always reminds us of Schubert's Wanderer: “Where you are not, that is where happiness is.”
The new hope Manuela Schwesig will commit the SPD to a left-wing course. She may then be the last chairwoman of a once proud and vibrant party.

The commentary by Leo Klimm from Paris rejects the claim that the connection between the riots in French cities and the origins of the rioters is racist and obscures French failures.
The Science Temporary Contract Act ensures precarious working conditions for mid-level academic staff. Critics complain that the fixed-term practice drives away talent and endangers the quality of research due to a lack of planning security.

At Germany Day in Bonn, the Junge Union called on Chancellor Friedrich Merz to implement reforms quickly. Merz appears self-confident and relies on coalition discipline, while the pension reform is causing conflict.

The Spiegel newsletter on the situation on Sunday by Dirk Kurbjuweit deals with the dwindling compassion in politics in the face of the crises in Ukraine, Israel and refugee policy.

At the IMF annual meeting in Thailand, Germany is celebrated as an economic model boy. But despite the return of growth, experts warn against a false sense of security and risky policies.

At the IMF meeting in Thailand, Germany is praised for falling debts and new growth. But the strength is deceptive and could lead to risky policies.