
During a debate organized by Libération, Dominique de Villepin and François Ruffin noted ideological convergences and envisaged an alliance for the presidential election, despite their different backgrounds, in a context of recomposition of the left.
AI-generated summary
Dominique de Villepin, former Prime Minister under Jacques Chirac, opposed the war in Iraq in 2003. François Ruffin, MP and founder of the newspaper Fakir, is known for his social commitment and his documentary 'Thank you boss!'. Both are positioning themselves outside the traditional parties for the presidential election.
This is the alliance we didn't see coming. During a debate organized by the newspaper Libération on Wednesday September 2, Dominique de Villepin and François Ruffin noted a good number of convergences in their ideas while they both wish to compete in the presidential election. But how far could this rapprochement go? “I don’t know if you have already prepared the PACS, but let’s say we sniff each other,” declared the deputy for the Somme.
Twenty years ago, such a prospect seemed impossible when Fakir's journalist, a man of the left, marched against the CPE project launched by the Prime Minister of Jacques Chirac. Today, even if it remains surprising, it can be politically clever. “What is interesting is that they are two free men, but who are not copy-pasted,” argues Sophie Taillé-Polian, MP for Val-de-Marne and spokesperson for François Ruffin.
“Of course they are complementary”
Dominique de Villepin, the man who spoke before the United Nations against the war in Iraq in 2003, is very identified with geopolitical questions, which is not the case for François Ruffin. The latter, on the other hand, has a social image that the former tenant of Matignon lacks. Which has never been elected, while Picard has strong local roots. “Of course they are complementary,” continues the spokesperson. “There is, on the one hand, strong governmental and international experience, and, on the other, field experience closest to the concerns of the French.” Raquel Garrido, a former rebellious MP, having like François Ruffin distanced herself from Jean-Luc Mélenchon, followed the debate, which she found "interesting".
“There is naturally a lot of convergence because Villepin is gradually detaching himself from the economic software of the right.”
Raquel Garrido, former LFI deputy
at franceinfo
According to one of the organizers of the debate, it was Dominique de Villepin who was most willing to talk about convergence, while François Ruffin seemed to slow down a little more. “The exchanges were rich and showed points of agreement but also of disagreement, while maintaining honesty and respect”, believe those close to the Somme MP, “very happy to have been able to organize this debate”. It had been prepared with the teams of the two candidates, and facilitated by common knowledge. The idea was to make an impression. “It was successful beyond our expectations,” comments Dominique de Villepin’s entourage.
Because this rapprochement is also a way to get people talking about them and their ambitions. François Ruffin has been preparing for the presidential election for several years, with the project of reconciling "the France of the towns and the France of the towers". His ambition was to run in the left-wing primary, which was nipped in the bud by the refusal of the PS to participate. He maintained his candidacy but struggled to exist in the campaign. "Yesterday's sequence shows that François Ruffin is still in the competition. In the left-wing unity movement, there is only him, Marine Tondelier and Olivier Faure. The situation is not at all crystallized and they are right to stay in action", judges Raquel Garrido.
“A desire to break with the policy pursued today”
For his part, since the spring, Dominique de Villepin has regularly appeared in the media to promote his desire to be a candidate, without taking the step of an official declaration, leaving doubt about his desire or his ability to go through with it. “We are arriving at a moment in our history where we must move forward without calculation,” he said during the debate, saying he was ready to “sacrifice all his ambitions”.
Can we then imagine a withdrawal of one for the benefit of the other? “They are certainly complementary, but the gathering must be much broader than their two people”, comments Sophie Taillé-Polian, who calls for “a league of derailers”, using the expression used by François Ruffin during the debate. For him, it is a question of derailing "the crazy train" which would lead to a second round between Jean-Luc Mélenchon and Marine Le Pen, or even to the election of the far-right figure. The president of the think tank The Shift Project, Jean-Marc Jancovici, the journalist Natacha Polony and the director of Oxfam France, Cécile Duflot, are mentioned to join this league. “I really appreciated this debate,” comments soberly the former boss of environmentalists, contacted by franceinfo.
François Ruffin's spokesperson sets the rules for this not yet legendary league: "A demand for clarity vis-à-vis the National Rally and a desire to break with the policy pursued today." “Villepin ticks both boxes,” she adds. “There is a shared diagnosis, there is a common horizon,” summarized François Ruffin. New joint initiatives are being studied for the coming weeks. “We now need others to join in the dance,” hope those close to François Ruffin. “At the start of the school year, this is the first original moment of this campaign. We must not let the dust settle,” explains Dominique de Villepin’s entourage.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
New joint initiatives between Villepin and Ruffin will be announced in the coming weeks.
Likely · Within weeks
The 'league of derailers' will attract other public figures beyond Villepin and Ruffin.
Possible · Within weeks
Four American companies, including Blue Origin and SpaceX, have canceled their participation in the International Space Summit organized in Paris on September 9 and 10, according to the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Space, citing political pressure from the White House reported by Politico.

Lilia Mebarkia, LFI candidate in the senatorial elections in Var, has for eight months suffered threats of rape, kidnapping and death, as well as damage to property, which she attributes to her political commitment. She filed several complaints and testified publicly after months of cyberharassment and vandalism, including the damage to her disabled son's stroller and the burglary of her apartment.

Bruno Retailleau, president of the Republicans and presidential candidate, proposed in Le Figaro a new procedure allowing the French people to have the last word in the event of censorship of a law by the Constitutional Council, via referendum or parliamentary congress. According to an Odoxa-Backbone Consulting survey, 80% of French people support this idea, with broad support beyond political divisions, notably 88% of RN supporters and 76% of the PS.

A former senior Bercy official, Rayan Nezzar, has created a free online game called “The Battle of the Budget” which simulates the difficult choices of recovering French finances, based on his experience implementing a 10 billion euro savings plan in 2024.

As the presidential campaign begins, the National Rally proposes to sanction the wearing of the veil in public spaces, sparking a debate on secularism and gender equality. Author Naëm Bestandji claims that this measure is more about misogyny and patriarchy, arguing that the ban would be ineffective and counterproductive, turning women into martyrs rather than agents of change.

During a conference in Paris on September 2, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, La France Insoumise candidate for the 2027 presidential election, admitted to having changed his mind about wearing the Islamic veil after meeting veiled and unveiled women, admitting to having made a 'terrible mistake' in his past positions.