Breaking
TRStatement from the Minister of Justice Akın Gürlek on the fund investigation: Legal mechanisms are being operatedKRGwangju, Jeollanam-do lawmakers said, “We will build groundbreaking medical infrastructure in the western region of Musan.”KRExperts say, “Jeonse is unstable due to non-residency penalty”… Reduction of special long-term deductions is also consideredKRUlsan University Hospital Union “We must stop reducing the integrated nursing service ward”DEThis year: Unicredit wants to quickly control CommerzbankCNKe Zhien emphasized that he did not say that the construction of the 205 Arsenal House would cost 85 billion yuan! Lai Ruilong: Just say it casually without calculating it?CNTaiwan stocks soared 1,960 points, second in history! Foreign investors sold hard for NT$90 billion, and 47,900 of "this lot" were sold out, but bucked the trend and rose 5%DEBanks: Crédit Agricole wants to merge Banco BPM with its Italian subsidiaryEUKraków shooter dies in hospitalIN'A baseless smearing': China denies spying charge targeting Nvidia CEO Jensen HuangTRStatement from the Minister of Justice Akın Gürlek on the fund investigation: Legal mechanisms are being operatedKRGwangju, Jeollanam-do lawmakers said, “We will build groundbreaking medical infrastructure in the western region of Musan.”KRExperts say, “Jeonse is unstable due to non-residency penalty”… Reduction of special long-term deductions is also consideredKRUlsan University Hospital Union “We must stop reducing the integrated nursing service ward”DEThis year: Unicredit wants to quickly control CommerzbankCNKe Zhien emphasized that he did not say that the construction of the 205 Arsenal House would cost 85 billion yuan! Lai Ruilong: Just say it casually without calculating it?CNTaiwan stocks soared 1,960 points, second in history! Foreign investors sold hard for NT$90 billion, and 47,900 of "this lot" were sold out, but bucked the trend and rose 5%DEBanks: Crédit Agricole wants to merge Banco BPM with its Italian subsidiaryEUKraków shooter dies in hospitalIN'A baseless smearing': China denies spying charge targeting Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
BackCoupang Eats and Baemin protest against the Fair Trade Commission's imposition of fines... “Review of legal response” (comprehensive)
Coupang Eats and Baemin protest against the Fair Trade Commission's imposition of fines... “Review of legal response” (comprehensive)
Developing
연합뉴스11 minutes agoBusiness2 min readSouth KoreaView original

Coupang Eats and Baemin protest against the Fair Trade Commission's imposition of fines... “Review of legal response” (comprehensive)

When the Fair Trade Commission imposed a fine of 300 billion won on Baedal Minjok and Coupang Eats on charges of demanding preferential treatment, both companies protested in unison and indicated legal action.

Quick Look

When the Fair Trade Commission imposed a fine of 300 billion won on Baedal Minjok and Coupang Eats on charges of demanding preferential treatment, both companies protested in unison, saying it was a violation of fairness and a defensive measure.

AI-generated summary

Why It Matters

The Fair Trade Commission determined that Coupang Eats and Baemin, which have a combined market share of more than 90%, requested the most favorable treatment.

Font size

(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Hong Guk-ki = The operators of Baedal Minjok and Coupang Eats, two major delivery applications (apps), protested in unison when the Fair Trade Commission announced on the 9th that it would impose the first fine of 300 billion won each on their services.

Coupang, the operator of Coupang Eats, said in a statement that day, "The essence of this incident is that our efforts to provide better service to customers were found to be illegal."

The Fair Trade Commission determined that Coupang Eats and Baemin, which have a combined market share of more than 90%, demanded 'best treatment' from stores by taking advantage of the benefits provided to 'Wow Store' and 'Baemin Club Store', respectively.

Requesting preferential treatment refers to the act of requesting that restaurants adjust menu prices, minimum order amounts, etc. to be more favorable to consumers.

In response, Coupang Eats claimed that its market share at the time it entered the delivery app market was only 7%, and that it promoted competition in a market where Baemin's market share was more than 80%, and that there was not a single unauthorized contract termination with a restaurant owner.

In addition, the issue was raised that the penalty was more than 600 times more than that of similar cases in the past, which violated fairness, and that even sales of restaurant owners unrelated to the incident were used as the standard for calculating the penalty.

Previously, Yogiyo was fined 468 million won by the Fair Trade Commission in 2020 for demanding that restaurants not sell at a higher price than other sales channels and terminating contracts with restaurants that did not comply.

In addition, Woowa Brothers, Baemin's management company, said in an official statement, "We have faithfully explained that there is no illegality in this matter," and added, "We regret that this explanation was not fully accepted."

Woowa Brothers explained that the reason for introducing Baemin's preferential treatment (Baemin Club store conditions) was that it was introduced as a minimum level of defense in a situation where the market competition structure has changed rapidly over the past year since competitor Coupang Eats introduced membership-based preferential treatment (Wow store conditions).

He added, “The majority of stores were selected as Baemin Club stores regardless of the price conditions,” and “There was no forced action, such as the platform arbitrarily changing the price conditions of the store owners.”

In the case of Baemin, charges of reducing the exposure of 'store delivery' and distorting the expected delivery time in order to expand 'self-delivery' were also included in the Fair Trade Commission's sanctions.

Woowa Brothers explained, “Self-delivery is a service where the platform is directly responsible for everything from order brokering to delivery, customer response, and accident compensation.” They added, “In order to achieve the delivery quality that consumers want, there is no choice but to move towards the platform taking responsibility for delivery, and this is a common trend in the global delivery market.”

He then emphasized that, unlike Coupang Eats, it provides both self-delivery and store delivery services, adding, "In areas where it is difficult to operate self-delivery services, store delivery alone provides business owners with the opportunity to sell delivery apps."

He also claimed, “Self-delivery has a structure in which, in addition to the delivery fee paid by the business owner, the company bears all costs such as rider costs, customer service, and accident compensation,” and added, “The profit left to the company per order is actually greater for store delivery. However, the increased proportion of self-delivery is a result of reflecting consumers’ preferences according to delivery quality.”

The two companies plan to review the Fair Trade Commission's resolution and confirm the final response plan, including legal procedures.

What to Watch

AI outlook — possibilities, not facts

  • Commence legal action after reviewing the Fair Trade Commission resolution

    Very likely · Within weeks

Open Questions

  • Will the two companies actually file legal action?
  • What are the specific sanctions contained in the Fair Trade Commission's final resolution?

Related Topics

This article was originally published by 연합뉴스.

Related Stories

Hanssem's third quarter operating profit decreased by 76.5%... “Slowing profitability due to business reorganization” (comprehensive)
Business·

Hanssem's third quarter operating profit decreased by 76.5%... “Slowing profitability due to business reorganization” (comprehensive)

Hanssem announced on the 9th that its consolidated operating profit in the third quarter of this year was 1.6 billion won, a 76.5% decrease compared to the same period last year. Sales decreased by 19% to KRW 357.6 billion, but continued to remain profitable for 14 consecutive quarters along with an increase in cumulative operating profit.

연합뉴스
1 min read
More on this topicFair Trade Commission