Jiang Wanan shows off official documents on relocation. Lawyer exposes three major fallacies: contradictory stance as soon as he takes office

Taipei Mayor Chiang Wanan recently proposed the relocation of Songshan Airport. The outside world questioned the lack of any relevant proposals or suggestions in the past four years. Chiang Wanan also said that the Taipei City Government had replied to the central government in 2023, saying that the relocation of Songshan Airport would be beneficial to Taipei City's overall urban planning and development. Lawyer Huang Diying criticized Jiang Wanan's statement for having three major fallacies, which were basically inconsistent and a slap in the face.

Huang Diying pointed out in a Facebook post that when Chiang Wanan attended the Executive Yuan meeting, he presented the 112-year-old official document of the Taipei City Government on the cessation of pine needles in an attempt to prove that Jiang Wanan’s proposal to relocate the pine needles was not hastily proposed due to election emergency. However, the document of less than one page of the pine needles relocation by the North City Government not only failed to prove that Jiang Wanan was a responsible political opinion on the pine needles, but also severely criticized Jiang Wanan’s three inconsistent fallacies.

Please read on...

Huang Diying questioned Jiang Wanan's statement on three fallacies. First, the official document released by the Beijing Municipal Government highlights Jiang Wanan’s vacillating and inconsistent stance less than a year after taking office. When Chiang Wanan ran for mayor of Taipei in 2022, he opposed the relocation of Songshan Airport. At that time, he also strongly criticized Wu Yinong, who advocated the relocation, for "hastily proposing it just after the election" and believed that the relevant propositions had "national security concerns." However, the official document produced by Chiang Wanan on the relocation of Songji in Taipei City in 2023 agreed that the relocation of Songji would be beneficial to Taipei's urban development, highlighting Chiang's vacillating stance and apparent inconsistency in less than a year since he took office.

Second, Jiang Wanan produced an official document of less than one page, which did not explain Jiang’s national security concerns when he questioned Wu Yinong. Jiang Wanan presented a four-point overall plan for the Beishi Fu Songji, which was less than one page long. However, the whole article did not explain Jiang Wanan’s “national security concerns” when he questioned the relocation of Wu Yi’s agricultural pine machine. The official document from the Beishi Fu that Jiang Wanan took was a slap in the face.

Thirdly, the official document given by Jiang Wanna to loosen the machine is less than one page, which highlights that Jiang has not conducted a feasibility assessment by the city government on the relocation of the loose machine, and is not responsibly proposing a policy. Huang Diying questioned that Jiang Wanan hastily proposed to relocate the machine without explaining the national security concerns that Jiang himself had questioned, nor did he conduct a feasibility assessment by the city government. It was clear that he sought medical treatment because of an urgent election situation!