
AI-generated summary
The investigation is being conducted on suspicion of defrauding health insurance companies of a home care provider.
At the center of the investigation is an organization that reportedly provides home care services to intensive care patients. The prosecutor's office suspects that patients were served by staff who did not have the necessary qualifications and that care services that were not provided or did not meet the requirements were billed to health insurance companies.
Allegedly, the main suspects in the investigation, Zeynep C. (49) and her 44-year-old husband, were arrested, and in addition to the invoice of 11 million euros, Zeynep C.'s luxury cars, jewelry and assets worth 5.9 million euros were seized.

Drone-supported inspection was carried out in Taksim Square, Istiklal Street and its surroundings, with the coordination of public order and Beyoğlu police. During the inspection, prostitution bargaining was detected with a drone and 4 people were arrested. 27 people were fined for behavior contrary to public morality and 17 businesses were fined.

Businessman Mehmet Fatih Tançalan, who came to the fore with his wedding with social media phenomenon Çağla Öz in Van's Tuşba district, was arrested and imprisoned within the scope of the money laundering investigation initiated by the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor's Office. As part of the investigation, Ankara Anti-Smuggling and Organized Crime Branch Directorate teams found 16 million 440 thousand euros and 700 thousand dollars in two vehicles determined to belong to Tançalan in a parking garage in Sarıyer Maslak. It is stated that this foreign currency is worth 934 million TL. In his statement, Tançalan said that he opened the VKH Motors gallery in Van's Muradiye district 3-4 years ago and had damaged vehicles repaired in the industrial site in Maslak. He also stated that he went to Dubai and opened a business called VKH Car Rental Dubai and received a residence permit. However, it was stated in the MASAK report that no direct financial transfer from Dubai to Turkey was detected on behalf of Tançalan or his wife Çağla Öz Tançalan. Studies are continuing to determine from which country, on what date, by whom and by what method the money was brought to Turkey. It was stated that while customs and travel records were examined, there was no confirmed record that the money was brought to Turkey by plane, road or any other route by a specific person.

Within the scope of the fund investigation, the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office requested the investor and transaction records of the funds belonging to 7 investment companies to the Central Registry Agency. 6 suspects were arrested, 2 of them were subjected to judicial control, and the number of detainees increased to 51. CMB filed a criminal complaint against 11 people regarding Özata Denizcilik transactions and imposed a transaction ban.

A lawsuit was filed against A.Ç., the 74-year-old former president of the Aid and Service Volunteers Association in Izmir, which is claimed to belong to the Süleymancıs, on the grounds that he systematically sexually assaulted 6 women and a girl in the association. A.Ç., who had been detained for approximately eight months, was released due to his age and duration of detention, and the hearing was postponed to 13.30 on January 21, 2027. Association administrators claim that they tried to cover up the events by describing them as "adultery".

It was revealed that the tooth of Gabi, the Asian elephant housed alone in Gaziantep Zoo, was broken. Animal rights advocates claimed that this damage was caused by the behavior of hitting the metal crossing gate, which was kept closed in violation of regulations. The garden management rejected the allegations and argued that the fracture was a genetic and physiological process and that there was no problem in monitoring the animal's health.

Turkish Academy of Sciences, in the last three Court of Accounts reports, determined that payments received within the scope of research support were purchased for products such as mobile phones, smart watches, headphones and books for personal use. The Academy argued that these products were technological necessity, but the Court of Accounts auditors stated that the products were personal needs because they were concentrated on a specific brand and were not recorded in the inventory records.