
AI-generated summary
Mehmet Fatih Tançalan is a businessman known as 'Kara Haydar from Van', who came to the fore with the jewelry and money worth millions of lira he wore at his magnificent wedding with social media phenomenon Çağla Öz in Tuşba district of Van. An investigation into money laundering was launched by the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, and within the scope of this investigation, Tançalan and his wife Çağla Öz Tançalan were arrested.
Ferit Zengin - Businessman Mehmet Fatih Tançalan, known as "Kara Haydar from Van", who came to the fore with the jewelry and money worth millions of liras he wore at his magnificent wedding with social media phenomenon Çağla Öz on September 6 in Tuşba district of Van, was arrested and imprisoned within the scope of the "money laundering" investigation initiated by the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor's Office. His wife, the phenomenon Çağla Öz Tançalan, was also arrested within the scope of the same investigation.
934 million foreign currency
As part of the investigation, Ankara Anti-Smuggling and Organized Crime Branch Directorate teams found out that money was found in vehicles determined to belong to Tançalan in a parking garage in Sarıyer Maslak. The teams, who carried out an operation in the parking lot called Maslak Auto Industry Parking Lot at around 02.00 last night, found 16 million 440 thousand euros and 700 thousand dollars in foreign currency in boxes during the searches in the luggage compartments of the two vehicles they detected.
The teams seized 2 luxury cars and 64 thousand 700 foreign currency worth 934 million TL, and detained a suspect who was determined to have brought the vehicles to the parking lot and parked them and took him to Ankara.
He said 'Maslak' in his statement
In his statement to the prosecutor's office, detainee Tançalan stated that he opened a gallery named VKH Motors in the Muradiye district of Van 3-4 years ago and that he had the damaged vehicles he purchased at the industrial site in Maslak repaired. It was noteworthy that the Maslak industrial zone, where the vehicles Tançalan described in his statement, was located, coincided with the address where the money was found.
Dubai connection being investigated
In his statement, Tançalan said that he went to Dubai last year and opened a business called VKH Car Rental Dubai, got a residence permit and planned to rent a car here. However, MASAK's report dated September 9, 2026 stated that no direct fund transfer was detected from Dubai to Turkey through the financial system on behalf of Tançalan or his wife Çağla Öz Tançalan.
NO SIGNS OF PASSING FROM CUSTOMS
The report included suspicion that if it was claimed that the revenues originated from Dubai activities, the money might have been smuggled into Turkey through accounts opened in the name of third parties or outside the financial system.
Studies are continuing to determine from which country, on what date, by whom and by what method the money was brought to Turkey.
In this context, it was stated that customs and travel records were also examined, but there was no confirmed record that the money was brought to Turkey by a specific person by plane, road or any other route.
The source of millions of foreign currency is being investigated
Within the framework of the investigation carried out by the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor's Office, the source of the millions of foreign currency seized, the financial traffic on which it is based and its place in the money laundering network continue to be examined in many aspects.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
More arrests will be made as part of the investigation.
Likely · Within weeks
New evidence will emerge as a result of examination of customs and travel records.
Possible · Within weeks

Drone-supported inspection was carried out in Taksim Square, Istiklal Street and its surroundings, with the coordination of public order and Beyoğlu police. During the inspection, prostitution bargaining was detected with a drone and 4 people were arrested. 27 people were fined for behavior contrary to public morality and 17 businesses were fined.

Within the scope of the fund investigation, the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor's Office requested the investor and transaction records of the funds belonging to 7 investment companies to the Central Registry Agency. 6 suspects were arrested, 2 of them were subjected to judicial control, and the number of detainees increased to 51. CMB filed a criminal complaint against 11 people regarding Özata Denizcilik transactions and imposed a transaction ban.

An investigation was launched in an organization that provides home care services to intensive care patients, alleging that unqualified personnel were employed and fraudulent invoicing was made. Two people were arrested on suspicion of stealing 11 million euros and assets worth 5.9 million euros were seized.

A lawsuit was filed against A.Ç., the 74-year-old former president of the Aid and Service Volunteers Association in Izmir, which is claimed to belong to the Süleymancıs, on the grounds that he systematically sexually assaulted 6 women and a girl in the association. A.Ç., who had been detained for approximately eight months, was released due to his age and duration of detention, and the hearing was postponed to 13.30 on January 21, 2027. Association administrators claim that they tried to cover up the events by describing them as "adultery".

It was revealed that the tooth of Gabi, the Asian elephant housed alone in Gaziantep Zoo, was broken. Animal rights advocates claimed that this damage was caused by the behavior of hitting the metal crossing gate, which was kept closed in violation of regulations. The garden management rejected the allegations and argued that the fracture was a genetic and physiological process and that there was no problem in monitoring the animal's health.

Turkish Academy of Sciences, in the last three Court of Accounts reports, determined that payments received within the scope of research support were purchased for products such as mobile phones, smart watches, headphones and books for personal use. The Academy argued that these products were technological necessity, but the Court of Accounts auditors stated that the products were personal needs because they were concentrated on a specific brand and were not recorded in the inventory records.