
The Galeria department store group has filed for bankruptcy for the fourth time. A commentary on the failure of a company that missed the boat with modern retail.
AI-generated summary
Galeria has already gone through three insolvency proceedings since 2020 and has benefited from state support and creditor waivers. The company has been struggling with declining market shares and missed digitization for decades.
The intellectual flexibility of Galeria's managers and owners is remarkable. In the three bankruptcies over the past six years, creditors gave up billions of dollars, landlords gave up the income they were contractually entitled to, and taxpayers gave up a large sum of money that was wasted in the department store cosmos. Galeria received at least 680 million euros in tax money - and three additional insolvency payments from the employment agency, i.e. from the contributors. And each time the company leaders said: Galeria now has a future.
What a mockery. Especially for the more than 10,000 employees who - for whatever reason - still believed in what was promised to them. On Friday, the company filed for bankruptcy proceedings for the fourth time since 2020. In the first bankruptcies, the department store group was able to excuse itself by citing the criminal energy of its then owner: Benko, the Austrian billionaire, as an enemy who fleeced the department stores in prime locations with excessive rents and thus prevented profitable business.
Alone: What profitable business should this be? The department store has outlived itself. At least in the form operated by Galeria. There are successful large-scale retailers, electronics retail chains or fashion houses with entrepreneurs and management who understand how customers want to shop. Those who provide quality advice, who can combine stationary business with digital, who have a local presence and loyal visitors and can therefore also be successful in less frequented city centers.
There are some Galeria branches that have even shown how to do this. But such positive individual cases are of no use if the shareholders refuse to invest and really want to change something. They are the gravediggers of the department store.
Until the beginning of the 1990s, four addresses essentially dominated the scene: in addition to Karstadt and Kaufhof, these were Hertie (taken over by Karstadt) and Horten (taken over by Kaufhof). 25 years ago, these four companies still operated around 400 department stores. While in the mid-1970s an impressive 15 percent of retail sales flowed into the cash registers of various department stores, three years ago Karstadt and Kaufhof collectively achieved less than one percent.
In 1996, Karstadt presented its “virtual department store”. Thirty years later, the online portion of the business is still only in the single digits. For decades nothing was invested; the company only lived off its assets and moved from one loan to the next. Galeria not only missed digitalization, but also missed practically all shopping trends.
The problem of loss of meaning has not disappeared just because the names Karstadt and Kaufhof were deleted. There were still around 180 department stores when the companies merged in 2018. The bankruptcies not only meant thousands of employees had to leave, but the number of branches was also more than halved. Today there are still 83, of which Galeria recently had to negotiate rents with 33.
It's a burden for any city that has such a block in its city center that can hardly be rented out. It's bitter for the employees. Annoying for creditors. But with the fourth bankruptcy, no one should really believe in Galeria's future. Wind down the department store!

The Chinese online retailer JD.com is about to receive approval from the EU Commission to take over the Ceconomy Group for 2.2 billion euros. After concerns about possible Chinese subsidies, JD.com offered infrastructure concessions.

According to financial circles, Michael Diederich, currently at Deutsche Bank, will not be the new CEO of Commerzbank. There are also numerous other personnel changes at institutions such as Berenberg, Flatex, Ergo and DZ Bank.

Nike reports disappointing quarterly figures and a decline in sales, causing its share price to plummet. Experts see homemade strategy mistakes at the US company, while Adidas and Puma stand out positively through local adjustments and gains in market share.

The pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk is repositioning itself after the hype surrounding semaglutide. With a product offensive, including the obesity drug Cagrisema, and a focus on new therapeutic areas such as liver and cardiovascular diseases, the company wants to establish five new blockbuster drugs by 2030.

In September, the raw materials market was heavily influenced by the consequences of the Iran War and the El Niño weather phenomenon. While orange juice and Brent oil saw significant price increases, coal made a comeback due to increased gas prices.
Schleswig-Holstein is realigning its settlement strategy. Economics Minister Madsen will focus on defense, renewable energies and the digital economy in the future, while the importance of markets such as China and the USA is decreasing.