Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold failed the durability test

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold again failed to withstand bending in the Pixel 11 Pro Fold durability test conducted by JerryRigEverything.

Pixel 11 Pro Fold durability test revealed important data about the physical structure of the device. Tests conducted by the popular technology channel JerryRigEverything reveal some of the weak points of Google's new foldable model.

Although there was no explosion on the battery side this time, unlike last year, the structural integrity of the device still raises serious questions. Although Google claims to have increased the overall durability of the Pixel 11 Pro Fold model, the performance of the device in the bending test remains below expectations.

Structural Problems and Antenna Line

As usual, the phone is broken into two at the point where the antenna line is located. This situation stands out as a design error that Google has also encountered in previous models and has not yet fully resolved.

The ceramic coating used on the outer screen of the device performs very well. The screen, which shows no signs of scratching up to level 6 on the Mohs hardness scale, encounters deep grooves at level 7.

The material used on the rear panel, called glass composite fiber, is actually a very hard plastic. This material can be easily scratched with a knife blow and weakens the premium perception of the device.

What Happened in the Bending Test

During the bending test, the parts of the device literally separate from each other. The front panel comes off as a result of force made with bare hands without using any tools.

It is observed that the rear panel can be removed quite easily. Google stated that it is almost impossible to break the back of the device, but test results do not support this claim.

This model, which is offered for sale with a price tag of $ 1,899, has difficulty reassuring users about its durability. Considering Google's design refresh cycle every two or three years, it's clear that this model is in need of a serious structural overhaul.

In particular, the sensitivity of the hinge and body junction points of foldable phones directly affects the long-term usage experience of users. It remains a matter of curiosity how the company will address these chronic problems in the next generation devices.

As well as the aesthetic appearance of the design, resistance to accidents that may be encountered in daily use is also of great importance. In a device that Google offers at such a high price, it is expected to better maintain structural integrity.

Do you think this kind of flimsy is acceptable in a $1,899 foldable phone?