
Criticism of the Tiktok algorithms and the lack of regulation for children's digital environment
Tiktok is sharply criticized for its algorithms that expose children and young people to harmful content, such as glorification of violence and mocking of school attack victims, similar to letting an inappropriate babysitter influence them.
AI-generated summary
Criticism of social media and their algorithms has increased in connection with young people being reached by violent and offensive content on places like Tiktok.
Free babysitter available! One who can sing and dance and entertain the kids for hours. Which soon also starts making a whole bunch of bad suggestions: Here, check out some super racist, misogynistic, violence-glorifying clips I've found for you.
Not many parents would feel comfortable letting such a type look after the children for several hours every day, not when you put it that way.
(Especially not if the person in question could also reasonably be suspected of gathering information for the Chinese Communist dictatorship.)
So why is it okay when this happens on Tiktok?
The alarms are sounding close, a selection just from the last few days:
Students who survived the school attack in Fagersta now receive videos mocking them and praising the killer in the Tiktok feed (P1 Morgon 22/9).
Svenska Dagbladet's fictitious 13-year-old only needs to do a search on the school killer's name to a few days later have a Tiktok feed consisting of one-third tributes to mass murderers, one-third neutral posts about mass murderers, one-third unrelated material (20/9).
And nine out of ten extreme clips with glorification of violence are allowed to remain, even if you report them (P3 Nyheter 19/9).
Add to that what we already know: that the algorithms are made to suck in the user and create a dependency. And then the general, half-founded feeling that the given format – short, rapping clips – saps memory, impulse control and concentration (The Atlantic 9/16).
I'm convinced that in the near future people will look at our handling of Tiktok as we ourselves now look at recent history's lax view of children and nicotine: Wait, were little kids allowed to buy cigarettes completely freely in the 90s? And there were smoking windows in the schoolyards?
"You can't clean up a room that's designed to be filled with shit"
Sure, there have finally been calls for regulation of Tiktok – yes, the equivalent of a smoke screen. But the basic problem will remain. To quote Carl Heath, senior researcher and leader of digital resilience at the state research institute Rise (SvD 20/9): "You can't clean up a room that is designed to be filled with shit."
Nor can you get it clean by indulging in partial demarcation, I would add.
"Here," entices the babysitter. “Take some crack.”
"Okay then, kids, do it," the adults sigh from the kitchen. “But only one!”
The Swedish Transport Administration plans to demolish 39 properties between Gumboda and Skellefteå until 2027 due to the construction of the Norrbotnia line. Of these, 23 villas are now empty and have given the police and emergency services a unique opportunity to practice in an entire residential area, something that was previously only possible in individual properties.
Sam Altman and Dario Amodei warned before the UN Security Council that AI technology could now improve itself, which could make humans' ability to control the systems inadequate. The warning came at the same time that both Open AI and Anthropic are preparing IPOs with potential values of up to SEK 1,000 billion. Clément Delangue from Hugging Face also spoke and emphasized that fear should not guide decisions about the future of AI.

Donald Trump proposes to replace the term artificial intelligence with superintelligence in all US documents, arguing that the technology is amazing and the word artificial sounds fake.

When Chinese President Xi Jinping meets the US leadership during his US trip, AI development is one of the hottest topics. Despite mistrust and a fierce race between the superpowers, there is a common interest in discussing security risks.

Peter, an AI researcher from a European country who works at Google in New York, describes how the tech giants' executives warn that AI could wipe out humanity while they themselves continue to develop the technology. He expresses concern about both existential risks and rapid labor market change, and notes that AI is being used in military contexts by the US, China and in the war in Ukraine.

Following warnings from defected AI researchers such as Jacob Coxon that AI could pose an existential threat, the EU's AI law has received new support. While US President Donald Trump dismisses the risks and relies on his own intelligence, the EU has responded with omnibus packages to ease the regulatory burden and now plans to invite AI labs to discussions on slowing development.