
AI-generated summary
The Handelsblatt calculator builds on previous studies such as Doodle's "State of Meetings Report 2019" and uses data from Microsoft researchers to quantify the costs of inefficient meetings.
Corporate Germany sits and talks. But many meetings deliver little output. The Handelsblatt calculator helps you to better estimate the costs of meetings - and to conduct them more efficiently.
Meeting time: How much did this meeting achieve? Photo: Phil Ninh
Berlin. 64 billion euros are wasted in Germany every year due to inefficient meetings. The meeting software company Doodle already came to this rough projection in its “State of Meetings Report 2019”. Adjusted for inflation, this is now around 80 billion euros, according to Handelsblatt calculations.
With a new calculator, Handelsblatt allows you to determine the costs of meetings - including a rough estimate of the inefficiency of the meeting. Tips from business also show how the efficiency of meetings can be increased.
Why the number of participants is so important for meetings
The central number that Handelsblatt uses to estimate the inefficiency of meetings is the number of participants. A study by Microsoft researchers provides the basis for this. Using online meetings, the researchers examined the influence of various parameters on the perceived involvement and efficiency of meetings. The data set behind this study is considered one of the largest in the field.
According to this study, the perceived inclusivity and the efficiency of a meeting are highly correlated. That's why the Handelsblatt equated the inclusivity of a meeting, as perceived by the individual, with the efficiency of a meeting. And therefore the number of participants is by far the largest influencing factor on inclusivity and meeting efficiency.
A meeting for two or three people is rated as inclusive by more than 90 percent of those surveyed; From six people onwards, this perception drops to 67 percent. If there are more than 15 people, only a third of the participants say that they felt welcomed and therefore perceived the meeting as efficient.
Lev Tankelevitch, one of the study authors, puts it this way: "Fewer people doesn't automatically make it a better meeting. But it has to be clear to everyone why they're taking part."
And this reason for participation is more obvious to the individual in smaller meetings, and satisfaction with small meetings is therefore greater. Additionally, smaller meetings have a higher chance of participation, and this also leads to greater perceived efficiency.
Some companies have therefore set fixed rules for meeting sizes. Jeff Bezos decided for Amazon that there should never be more people in a meeting than two pizzas could feed - i.e. eight people.
Bayer handles things in a similar way. Nisha Mahendrarajan from Bayer's meeting culture core team believes another principle is even more important: "If you can't contribute anything to a meeting or get nothing from it, you can politely leave the meeting early."
124 million euros That's how much Bayer could save if all 50,000 employees spent one hour less on meetings each week.
Many employees were very surprised when Mahendrarajan and her colleagues calculated what the company could save if everyone spent an hour less in meetings every week. “We’re talking about 124 million euros here – so you can really save money,” she says. This is precisely why efficient meetings are so important.
In addition to the number of participants, there are other factors that studies have shown have an impact on meeting efficiency, such as: Was there an agenda? Did the meeting start and end on time?
Companies like Microsoft have aligned their meeting policies with these findings and published these policies. And Bayer is in the process of distributing a similar catalog throughout the group.
Related topics
BayerGermanyMicrosoftJeff BezosResearch
The meeting computer cannot therefore represent an irrefutable, calculated truth about the exchange in the office. Rather, it is intended to provide a scientific basis for an all-too-well-known question: Was this meeting really necessary? Or wouldn't an email have been enough?
More: “There has never been such a reduction in the German economy”: The end of the manager as a mass profession
First publication: September 25, 2026, 4:00 a.m.
Published according to the editorial standards of the Handelsblatt. You can find more information in our guidelines.
More on the topic of our partners display
remind.me Take advantage of current low electricity/gas prices before prices rise again
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Other companies will introduce meeting limits, similar to Bayer or Amazon.
Likely · Within months
The use of meeting analysis tools such as the Handelsblatt calculator will increase in German companies.
Possible · Within months
The wage gap between women and men varies depending on the age group and federal state in Germany. A sorted presentation by gender and age shows clear differences in salary. The state of residence also significantly influences the salary level.
The German labor market is showing slight stabilization as companies want to cut fewer jobs, according to an ifo survey. The employment barometer rose to 95.1 points in September. However, workforce reductions continue in industry and commerce; new hires are only planned in certain sectors.

VNG boss Ulf Heitmüller emphasizes that despite a historically low storage level of 57 percent, the German gas system is more robust than in 2022 and there is no immediate supply risk, although prices have more than doubled and cold weather and global disruptions could trigger price spikes.

The German economy is expected to grow by 1.3 percent in 2026 and by 1.1 percent in 2027, according to current forecasts. The SPD sees this as a success of government economic stimulus programs and is planning a “New Deal” to further strengthen it. Experts like Daniel Stelter and Prof. Dr. Stefan Kooths from IfW, on the other hand, discuss the causes of the upswing and the need for structural reforms.
The article refutes the AfD and BSW's claim that Russian gas is a cheap solution to the energy crisis by debunking three myths: Russian gas was never cheap, became a political bargaining chip under Putin and comes from distant fields. Instead, Germany today sources gas primarily from Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium, while LNG only plays a minor role. Russia is no longer needed, fossil energy remains expensive and consumption is becoming cheaper through photovoltaics, storage and heat pumps.

After a real estate loan has been fully repaid, it can be financially advantageous not to have the land charge registered in the land register deleted in order to save costs and effort in future financing needs, especially in the case of renovations, modernizations or family transfers.