The court mandates year-round prohibition of firecrackers on streets and public areas to combat toxic pollution and noise.
AI-generated summary
The court previously ordered a ban on firecrackers on public roads during the Ganesh Chaturthi festival due to air and noise pollution concerns.
Mumbai: Ahead of Diwali festival, the Bombay High Court on Thursday said its order banning bursting of firecrackers on public roads and streets will be applicable throughout the year.
A bench of Justices G S Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale said the "toxic pollution" from firecrackers affects every person, especially senior citizens and children, and the air pollution increases after Diwali.
During the Ganesh Chaturthi festival last month, the bench had ordered a complete ban on bursting of firecrackers on public roads noting that it causes not only air pollution but also noise pollution.
The court had then taken suo motu (on its own) cognizance of the issue of noise pollution during festivals.
On Thursday, the bench remarked that the government and other authorities seemed to have no control over the bursting of firecrackers.
"There is a state of lawlessness. We are all bound by the Constitution, and the rights of citizens are paramount. The problem is the non-following of law," the court said.
The bench said its earlier order banning firecrackers on public roads shall be applicable throughout the year and in respect of all festivals, noting that this would meet the ends of justice.
The court said the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) shall issue appropriate notices stating that the "burning of firecrackers at all public places, namely streets, lanes, and footpaths, shall not be permitted."
The authorities shall also carry out a campaign to make citizens aware of the ill-effects of toxicity brought about by the bursting of firecrackers, the judges said.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Authorities will issue formal notices prohibiting firecracker use in public areas.
Very likely · Within days

A hearing was held in the Supreme Court on the alleged misbehavior with protesters, lawyers and journalists by the police during the protests in Delhi. The court considered the allegations serious and directed the police to submit the investigation report.
The Supreme Court of India has issued notices to the Centre and Delhi Police regarding a plea to hold protest organizers financially liable for damages. The court is also reviewing petitions on designated protest sites and alleged voter roll irregularities.
The Supreme Court ruled that police cannot direct social media platforms under the IT Act to share an accused's digital footprints for periods preceding the crime under investigation, emphasizing proportionality and privacy rights, while quashing a Ghaziabad Police order targeting journalist Abhishek Upadhyay and directing the return of his seized vehicle.
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation announced the reopening of all metro stations after temporary entry/exit restrictions were imposed on certain stations during protests, confirming that 272 trains operated on Oct 10 with 32 lakh commuters, and that full operations resumed after 10 pm, with key interchange stations maintaining line connectivity despite regulated access.
The Supreme Court directed Delhi Police to depute a senior officer to respond to allegations of sexual harassment of women journalists during the Oct 10 protest, while also hearing petitions on contempt of court, police excesses, and political activity inside court premises.
The Supreme Court Bar Association decided to file a contempt petition against Kerala Congress for a deleted social media post asking CJI Surya Kant to quit, while Mamata TMC MP Mahua Moitra's sarcastic misspelling of the CJI's name drew condemnation from SCBA, SCAORA, and SC Women Lawyers Association.