AI-generated summary
The case originated in April when the Gauhati High Court set aside an earlier Foreigners' Tribunal opinion declaring Mumtaz Begum a foreigner and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. She reappeared before the tribunal on May 30, the date of the fresh opinion, and was taken into custody. The court had previously ordered an inquiry on September 3 and directed the MEA to trace her and facilitate her return, observing she was sent to Bangladesh without a reasonable opportunity to challenge the tribunal's opinion.
Gauhati high court has intensified scrutiny of circumstances in which Nagaon's Mumtaz Begum was sent to Bangladesh, warning Assam govt that it would presume a Foreigners' Tribunal's May 30 opinion declaring her a foreigner would be considered "not ready" if the state fails to establish when it was finalised. In its latest order on Oct 7, the high court recorded MEA's submission that an inquiry into Mumtaz's whereabouts was ongoing and that it needed more time. TOI had reported that Bangladesh's home ministry began searching for Mumtaz after this newspaper contacted authorities in Dhaka in the last week of Sept.Not only Mumtaz, another woman also 'missing' after B'desh expulsion The Gauhati high court, in its Oct 7 order, said, "The court shall presume that the opinion...was not made ready within the appropriate time, i.e., prior to the taking into custody" of Mumtaz. The court had ordered an inquiry on Sept 3 and directed MEA to trace Mumtaz and facilitate her return, observing that she was sent to Bangladesh without a "reasonable opportunity" to challenge the tribunal's opinion. The court had previously set aside an earlier opinion declaring her a foreigner and ordered fresh consideration of her case. Her son, Momruz Ali, had on Oct 7 disputed Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma's claim that she was safe and in regular contact with him and had told TOI that the family had no idea where she was and that the family was "breaking" under the strain of the search. The case dates back to April, when Gauhati HC set aside an earlier Foreigners' Tribunal opinion declaring Mumtaz a foreigner and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. She appeared before the tribunal again on May 30, the date borne by the fresh opinion, and was taken into custody. The central question now before the court is whether that opinion had actually been made ready before officials acted on it. According to the chronology recorded in court proceedings, Mumtaz was subsequently moved through holding facilities in Assam and handed over to BSF on June 13.
Join conversation
Share your thoughts in the comments
Be respectful · TOI community guidelines
BSF told the court she was "sent back to Bangladesh" in the early hours of June 14, from the Kalaincherra area of Cachar. Her whereabouts have remained unknown to her family since she was sent across the border, according to her son. Mumtaz is not the only woman from Nagaon reported missing after being sent across the border. Another woman, Jahanara Begum, whose case is ongoing in HC, has also gone missing under similar circumstances. The high court heard her case together with that of Mumtaz Begum.
End of Article
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The Gauhati High Court will rule that the Foreigners' Tribunal's May 30 opinion was not made ready in time if the Assam government fails to prove its timing.
Likely · Within weeks
The MEA's inquiry into Mumtaz Begum's whereabouts will continue without yielding immediate results.
Possible · Within months
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant declined a meeting requested by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and MP Rahul Gandhi to discuss 'vote chori' allegations, stating that similar issues are already pending adjudication before the Supreme Court and that a meeting would contravene the separation of powers, which is part of the Constitution's basic structure. The CJI advised that grievances should be raised via a petition, which would be given priority hearing if filed before 4pm Monday.
A federal judge has blocked construction of an ICE detention facility in Santa Clara County, California, ruling that the government failed to conduct mandatory environmental reviews regarding potential hazardous waste and infrastructure capacity.
A federal judge has halted construction of a planned ICE detention facility near Gilroy, California, ruling that the government must complete environmental reviews. The injunction follows a lawsuit by California officials citing potential ecological and infrastructure risks.
The Supreme Court of India ordered authorities to stop illegal detentions and ensure normal metro and internet services during protests in Delhi. The bench emphasized the need to maintain public access to justice and professional duties amid ongoing demonstrations.

The Supreme Court, in a special hearing, said that according to the law, unhindered movement of people will be allowed in the city and no one will be detained without due process. The court has also given directions on metro, internet and rights of protest.
The Supreme Court announced it will pass an interim order to ensure normal Delhi Metro operations, free public movement, internet restoration, and unhindered duties for lawyers amid protests in the national capital.