
Research indicates that without tariff levies, prices for 67 categories of goods would have declined by nearly 1%.
AI-generated summary
The report analyzes the economic impact of tariffs implemented during the Trump administration. It highlights the transmission of import costs to consumer price levels.
The cost of many everyday items would have declined last year and early this year without President Donald Trump's tariffs, according to the New York Federal Reserve.
The cost of 67 categories of goods were 2.9 percentage points higher as of February thanks to tariffs, according to a paper from a team of researchers at the central bank's New York arm.
Without the levies, the team found that prices for the products they studied would have pulled back by almost 1%.
The New York Fed's report offers the clearest evidence yet of the impact of Trump's tariffs — a core policy of his reelection campaign and second term in the White House — on consumers' wallets. Economists had widely expected his levies to push up prices, though the precise effects had been hard to estimate due to the changing nature of the policy and the lack of transparency on how companies set their prices.
The researchers didn't say which 67 types of goods they evaluated.
For each percentage point increase in the average tariff, the team said that consumer goods prices were higher by roughly a quarter of a percent a year later.
Annual price growth in the dozens of goods they tracked peaked at the start of 2026, according to the report. But consumers are still expected to pay elevated prices into 2027 as a result of the policy, it said.
Roughly two-thirds of the tariff-related price impact have directly come from the levies themselves, according to the New York Fed's report. The remaining increase was driven by knock-on effects, such as U.S.-based companies that use imported parts and materials in their products.
"Tariffs have a larger and more drawn-out impact on consumer prices than the direct effect alone would suggest," the study's three authors, Mary Amiti, Sebastian Heise, and David Weinstein, wrote.
Trump argued that companies could absorb the increased cost from tariffs rather than pass them down to shoppers in the form of price hikes. The New York Fed team said that around 26% of last year's tariff increases ended up trickling into higher prices.
The Supreme Court in February struck down many of Trump's tariffs, resulting in billions of dollars in refunds to retailers. The White House has vowed to push forward with levies through alternative measures, and products imported from many countries now often face levies of about 10%. In many cases, that is significantly less than what they were under the earlier round of tariffs.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Consumers will continue to pay elevated prices through 2027.
Likely · Within years

President Donald Trump reported over 500 securities trades in August, totaling up to $273.3 million. Notable transactions include a $25 million Meta stock purchase and a SpaceX debt investment made days before he signed a national space transportation policy.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) has raised its growth forecast for global commodity trade by 2026 from 1.9 percent to 3.9 percent, compensating for the negative effects of the Middle East conflict on supply chains.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) has raised its forecast for global commodity trade growth to 3.9% by 2026 and calls artificial intelligence investments a key driver of growth, balancing the negative impact of conflict in the Middle East.

Tech companies like Broadcom, Oracle and SpaceX are seeking billions in funding from investors like Apollo and Blackstone to meet the huge demand for AI chips.

Russia's international reserves fell by $9.5 billion to $733.2 billion as of October 2, 2026, primarily due to negative revaluation, according to the Bank of Russia.

Asset managers are filing for SEC approval of hundreds of ETFs tracking NHL and MLB team season statistics via futures contracts. Experts warn the products lack economic purpose and resemble gambling, potentially putting retail retirement savings at risk.