The surviving relatives had sued the Federal Republic of Germany because of the alleged lack of supervision of the co-pilot.
The Braunschweig Regional Court has dismissed the lawsuit filed by survivors of the Germanwings disaster for additional compensation for pain and suffering against the Federal Republic of Germany, as equivalent claims can be asserted against the airline.
AI-generated summary
A Germanwings plane crashed in 2015, killing 150 people. Survivors demanded additional compensation from the Federal Republic.
In the trial for additional compensation for victims' relatives after the crash of a Germanwings plane with 150 deaths, the Braunschweig regional court dismissed the lawsuit. In the Chamber's opinion, the surviving dependents can assert equivalent claims against Germanwings GmbH. Therefore, they are not entitled to compensation for pain and suffering arising from official liability against the Federal Republic of Germany.
The judge referred to the Montreal Convention, which regulates liability in international air transport. On this basis, injured parties could in principle assert both their own claims for compensation and those that have been transferred to them.
30 survivors are each demanding up to 110,000 euros from the Federal Republic of Germany. The plaintiffs are convinced that the co-pilot's fitness to fly was not adequately monitored at the time. In their view, the aeromedical reports with regard to possible mental illnesses were also not far-reaching enough.
Among the 150 occupants of the crashed plane were 16 students and two teachers from the high school in Haltern am See in North Rhine-Westphalia, who were on their way back from a student exchange in Spain. The disaster caused great consternation and sadness.
Lawsuit should provide “clarity”.
Even after the trial began in Braunschweig at the end of August, Klaus Radner said: “Well, I see our chances at one percent.” He lost his daughter, a grandchild and his daughter's boyfriend in the plane crash in the Alps. Radner believed that many organizations and people had failed. “And we just want to name those responsible and have them convicted,” he said at the time.
The aim of the lawsuit is to provide clarity and to ensure that a case like this never happens again, said Engelbert Tegethoff, who lost a daughter in the crash, after the start of the trial. “It’s not about the money,” he emphasized. “The goal is to ensure that a catastrophe like this never happens again.” Then, from his point of view, people's deaths wouldn't have been completely pointless.
Lufthansa made payments after the accident. According to previous information from the airline, next of kin received 10,000 euros in compensation per person, and 25,000 euros were also paid for each fatality as so-called inheritable compensation.
A 72-year-old man from the Ludwigslust-Parchim district has confessed before the Schwerin regional court to the sexual abuse of children in Asia and the possession of child pornographic content. The defendant faces a prison sentence of five to seven years.
The Spanish Supreme Court has lifted the arrest warrant against Catalan separatist leader Carles Puigdemont. The basis is a decision by the Constitutional Court, which extends the amnesty law to include allegations of embezzlement of public funds.

The Braunschweig regional court has dismissed a lawsuit filed by 30 survivors of the Germanwings crash in 2015 for additional compensation for pain and suffering against the Federal Republic of Germany.
The Gelsenkirchen administrative court will hear the first lawsuits against the rural doctor quota in North Rhine-Westphalia on Tuesday. Doctors are suing against the threat of a contractual penalty of 250,000 euros if the ten-year commitment is not met.
On October 24th, the judiciary will auction off luxury cars, motorcycles and watches confiscated in Stuttgart's Mercedes-Benz Museum. Proceeds of around two million euros are expected from proceedings involving money laundering, tax fraud and drug trafficking.
The Federal Court of Justice has decided that foreigners threatened with deportation may not be detained solely because of their behavior. A risk of escape requires a clear expression of the intention to withdraw.