Despite Trump's Gaza plan and the October 10 ceasefire, it is stated that Israel has increased its military control and daily massacres continue.
AI-generated summary
The Trump Gaza plan, announced on September 29, 2025, led to a ceasefire on October 10.
Editor of The Palestine Chronicle, journalist Dr. Ramzy Baroud wrote about the ongoing occupation in Gaza under the guise of a ceasefire for AA Analysis.
Let's make one thing clear from the start: The so-called Trump Gaza plan, announced on September 29, 2025 and leading to the October 10 ceasefire, created widespread hope that international diplomacy would finally stop the violence.
However, the facts on the ground today paint a completely different picture. Despite massive global support for the plan to end the violence, evidence suggests that Israel is using the agreement to overcome military challenges in Gaza while retaining much of its control over the besieged territory.
The plan did not return Gaza to pre-genocide days. While the intermittent Israeli violence in the past has now turned into daily massacres, the siege before the genocide has evolved into a suffocating blockade falling on a people trying to hold on to life among the rubble of their cities and refugee camps.
Genocide under the guise of ceasefire
According to data from the Ministry of Health in Gaza, Israeli forces have killed at least 1,471 Palestinians and injured 5,189 since the ceasefire began on October 10, 2025. And these numbers do not even include those who lost their lives due to diseases, lack of medical care and other consequences of the ongoing humanitarian disaster. In any other conflict these figures would be seen as clear evidence that the war was continuing. However, in Gaza, all of this is recorded under the shadow of the reassuring rhetoric of the ceasefire. The even more heartbreaking part is that there were at least 327 dead and 547 injured children among the victims.
According to the joint statement published by more than 100 humanitarian aid and human rights organizations, there is not a single hospital left working at full capacity in Gaza. Morgues are constantly overflowing with new corpses, as well as hundreds of dead bodies pulled from the rubble. According to estimates, around 10 thousand Palestinians are still lying in the rubble of destroyed buildings. How can a ceasefire be called a situation that obliges the Ministry of Health in Gaza to keep separate records for those killed during the genocide and those murdered since the so-called end of the conflict? Can a ceasefire be something that allows bombardments to resume without warning, vehicles carrying civilians being hit, houses collapsing on their occupants, and families continuing to bury their children?
Broken promises and shrinking living spaces
The provisions of the agreement regarding humanitarian aid are also largely left in the air. The plan envisaged an aid flow of approximately 600 trucks per day. However, a UN assessment revealed that during the first 172 days of the agreement, UN-coordinated humanitarian aid shipments remained below 100 trucks per day on average. So where are those vital work machines to remove the rubble, exhume the bodies, and begin rebuilding the places Israel ravaged?
Speaking of debris, there are currently approximately 61 million tons of debris in Gaza, according to data from humanitarian organizations. This amount is approximately 20 times the destruction caused by all wars around the world in the last 18 years. The ruins are also a deadly trap for Palestinians. Last month, 21 people, including 12 children, died as a result of the collapse of a damaged building in Gaza.
While all this is happening, the living spaces of Palestinians are becoming increasingly narrow. According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, since the ceasefire began, Israel's military control area has expanded from approximately 53 percent to 63 percent (by some estimates, 70 percent) of Gaza. Despite massive international support for the plan, the agreement's guarantors have been unable to stop Israel's ongoing oppression or ensure the implementation of key provisions. Instead, the issue of disarming the Palestinian resistance became the focus of political discussions, as if the resistance itself was responsible for colonialism, military occupation, siege, apartheid regime and genocide.
Although the ceasefire was advocated by the Trump administration and its allies as a final solution to peace, in practice Israel used it to regroup and achieve goals that it had difficulty achieving in the past. Within the framework of the regulation, while Israel's military activities, territorial expansion steps and restrictions on basic needs continue, Palestinians are expected to stay away from armed actions.
Danger of a new status quo
Unless concrete resistance is put forward against Israel's policies - whether by the Palestinians themselves or through uninterrupted international political and legal pressure - there is a danger that Israel will accelerate its ethnic cleansing moves against the Palestinians in Gaza. This is exactly why Gaza must remain at the center of the international agenda. Social mobilization, political pressure, legal accountability and solidarity efforts cannot be shelved just because an agreement is called a 'ceasefire'.
The international community must challenge the assumption that genocide is over simply because the language used to describe Israel's actions has changed. A ceasefire that has no sanctions, lacks accountability mechanisms and does not end the occupation cannot be an alternative to the freedom of Palestine.
Azerbaijan participated in the Central Asian Heads of State Summit as a full member for the first time and established the Turkestan Six (C6) format. While this development provides a strategic advantage to Türkiye thanks to the Shusha Declaration, it strengthens logistics sovereignty over the Central Corridor and deepens regional integration with the vision of 'Six economies, one product'.

The fund crisis in Türkiye is defined as a result of the dispossession process that begins with the separation of surplus value production and financial gains. He associates the crisis with speculation and rent-oriented investments facilitated by the financial and political-cultural relations of the AKP regime. The analysis emphasizes that a situation has emerged in which financial gains grow in an environment where productive investments suffer from resource shortages, and this process shows that the economic bases of political Islam have been exhausted.

Although Izmir Mayor Cemil Tugay said that there were no people who would switch to AKP in 2025 and that he would resign if he changed parties, he took the AKP badge from Recep Tayyip Erdoğan at the end of 2026. This led to criticism that it violated its own ethical standards and undermined the trust of voters.

The article states that US President Donald Trump proposes to live-stream the execution of attack suspect Nidal Hasan in Fort Hood, Texas, and plans to use this decision as a campaign strategy, support for the death penalty and a message of Islamophobia. At the same time, it emphasizes that Trump wants the Nobel Peace Prize and that this request is in contrast to the fact that Navi Pillay was deemed worthy of the award for the actions in Gaza.

The article begins by defining the daily and political meanings of anarchy and claiming that there is an environment of anarchy and chaos under the current AKP rule in Turkey. Events such as the statements of the NEW Party leader in Artvin, Özgür Özel, about fund games and the emphasis on football funds in the Sözcü newspaper dated October 5, 2026, 650 people withdrawing 227 billion liras, allegations of insight and manipulation, the AKP candidate going abroad and Cemil Tugay resigning from his party and joining the AKP are described. Additionally, the withdrawal of money before the fund liquidation decision, the example of Evrim Tavacı on the first page of Sözcü, and the regulatory deficiencies regarding the capital markets board are highlighted.

Erdoğan listed the conditions of justice at the International Justice Summit in Istanbul and criticized the UN's veto system, using the phrase 'the elephant in the room'. Emphasizing the democratic and legal regression in Turkey, he stated that the government resorted to ethnicist rhetoric and pressure tactics after the election loss.