
Portrait of the conservative criminal lawyer, recently entered into legal proceedings over the murder of Thomas Perotto.
Me Jérôme Triomphe, a conservative and discreet criminal lawyer known for having defended the parents of Vincent Lambert, now represents victims of the Crépol tragedy in the investigation into the murder of Thomas Perotto.
AI-generated summary
Me Jérôme Triomphe represented the activists of the Manif pour tous and the parents of Vincent Lambert.
In life, Me Jérôme Triomphe is a jovial man, a false shy man. He is also a conservative, close to traditional Catholic circles. The criminal lawyer was the lawyer for activists from the Manif pour tous and the parents of Vincent Lambert, whose interests he defended in the very sensitive procedure relating to the cessation of this man's treatment. Today, he represents, among others, the parents of Émile Soleil. However, his words are rare. Me Jérôme Triomphe is not the most media-oriented lawyer. Rather those who distrust journalists, and after whom the press runs, often in vain.
When he accepts the exercise, in this month of September, it is, he says, “so that the truth comes out”. In complete discretion, Me Triomphe recently entered into the legal proceedings relating to the murder of Thomas Perotto. His clients are two victims, a father and his son who were present in this clash, at the end of the Crépol ball, between rugby players and young people from the Monnaie district in Romans-sur-Isère, on November 18, 2023. Both were injured in the fight. They knew Thomas Perotto, this 16-year-old rugby player killed by two stab wounds.
At the heart of summer, the lawyer became the architect of a major criminal response. It’s his…

The National Financial Prosecutor's Office asked the Paris Criminal Court to declare Rachida Dati guilty of concealment of abuse of power and trust, and Carlos Ghosn of abuse of power and trust, on the last day of their trial.

TikTok has agreed to pay $100 million to the US state to end a lawsuit regarding the protection of minors. The platform was accused by Alabama of exposing young users to dangerous content via its algorithm.

A British employee suffering from Tourette syndrome, dismissed after insulting a colleague because of his verbal tics, obtained more than 11,000 euros in compensation following a decision by the Liverpool court for discrimination.

The Court of Cassation validated a difference in treatment in a collective transport agreement, ruling that disparities in compensation between executives and other employees, when negotiated by unions, are presumed justified.

A judicial investigation has been opened in Paris concerning the drinking water crisis in Guadeloupe. More than 250 plaintiffs, supported by several associations, are seeking compensation for water cuts and persistent pollution, particularly chlordecone.

The administrative court of Montpellier ordered the mayor of Palavas-les-Flots to ban a bullfight scheduled for October 10, 2026. The judge considered that the ten-year interruption of this practice prevents the legal exception linked to an uninterrupted local tradition from being justified.