From March 10th, the Cologne Administrative Court wants to hear the main proceedings on whether the BfV can classify the AfD as definitely right-wing extremist.
AI-generated summary
The BfV classified the AfD as definitely right-wing extremist last year, whereupon the party took legal action against it.
The Cologne Administrative Court wants to negotiate from March 10th about whether the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) can classify the AfD as definitely right-wing extremist. A court spokesman told the German Press Agency that these plans had been communicated to those involved in the proceedings.
For capacity reasons, the trial will take place in a justice building in Siegburg near Cologne. The building was built for 43 million euros in order to be able to handle the expected flood of cum-ex lawsuits. But since there have only been a few cases regarding cum-ex tax fraud so far, it is largely empty.
At the beginning of this year, the Cologne Administrative Court decided in an urgent procedure that the Office for the Protection of the Constitution was not allowed to classify the AfD as a confirmed right-wing extremist effort for the time being and to monitor it accordingly. The domestic intelligence service continues to treat the party as a suspected case in the right-wing extremist spectrum. However, this first court decision was only provisional - the case is now to be dealt with in detail in the main proceedings.
In its urgent decision in February, the court took the view that there was sufficient certainty that efforts directed against the free, democratic basic order were being developed within the AfD. However, this “does not shape it in such a way that, based on its overall picture, an anti-constitutional tendency can be identified,” said the court.
Last year, after several years of review, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution classified the AfD as definitely right-wing extremist. The suspicion that the party is pursuing efforts against the free democratic basic order has been confirmed and has largely become a certainty, according to the domestic secret service.
The AfD took legal action against this. She filed a lawsuit and an urgent application with the Cologne Administrative Court because the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution is based in Cologne (AZ 13K3895/25 and 13L1109/25). In doing so, the AfD wanted to have the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution prohibited from listing, classifying and treating it as right-wing extremist. She was successful in the expedited procedure - but now the main proceedings are coming into view.
Once the Cologne Administrative Court has decided the case, the legal dispute does not have to be over yet. The decision can then be appealed at the next higher instance. The legal dispute over the question of whether the AfD can be classified as right-wing extremist could drag on for a long time.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The main proceedings begin on March 10th at the Cologne Administrative Court
Very likely · Within weeks
Sahra Wagenknecht sharply criticizes Chancellor Friedrich Merz for not including the electricity tax cut agreed in the coalition agreement in the 2027 budget. She describes this as humiliation and an “electricity price rip-off”.

The European Court of Justice has dismissed seven Polish lawsuits against key parts of the EU's “Fit for 55” climate package. Poland had, among other things, demanded that unanimity was necessary.

The Bundestag Budget Committee is discussing the budget for the coming year. The savings list presented by Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil in the summer has largely been shredded. Budget consolidation will be canceled in 2027.

The Bundestag's Budget Committee is holding its marathon adjustment meeting on the 2027 budget draft. Federal ministers have to justify themselves while items such as the electricity tax are being disputed and the opposition and the government are debating new debt.
More than half of those receiving citizen's benefit in communities of need with underage children do not have German citizenship. This emerges from a response from the federal government. Since 2010, the relationship with German recipients has reversed.

The Bundestag has passed the Starting Opportunities and Quality Development Act. It provides for mandatory tests for four-year-old children and targeted support. While the government speaks of more equal opportunities, the opposition criticizes planned cuts in federal funding for daycare centers.