Nepal's former chief justice Cholendra Shumsher Rana taken under police protection
Police deny local media reports of an arrest, stating former chief justice Cholendra Shumsher Rana was placed under protection due to a security threat.
Quick Look
Nepal's former chief justice Cholendra Shumsher Rana was moved to a police station in Kathmandu under protection following a reported security threat, police confirmed.
AI-generated summary
Why It Matters
Cholendra Shumsher Rana became chief justice in 2019 and faced a suspended impeachment motion in 2022 before the Supreme Court ruled the motion lost its purpose.
Synopsis
Cholendra Shumsher Rana was taken to a police station from his residence following a reported security threat. Police stated that he was placed under protection after receiving this threat information. Authorities have not disclosed the source of the alleged threat regarding Rana's safety.
Kathmandu: Nepal's former chief justice Cholendra Shumsher Rana was taken to a police station from his residence here on Sunday.
Local media reports said that Rana was arrested in connection with a criminal case. The police, however, denied the reports, saying the former chief justice had been "placed under protection" following information about a possible security threat.
The Kathmandu Valley Crime Investigation Office confirmed that Rana was taken to its office in Teku. Senior Superintendent of Police Santosh Khadka said the former judge was brought "under police security" after authorities received information that he could face an attack.
The police have not publicly identified the source of the alleged threat.
Live Events
A police team went to his residence in Maharajgunj around midnight and took him to the police office in the early hours of Sunday.
Rana became the chief justice on January 1, 2019. An impeachment motion was registered against him in Parliament on February 13, 2022, following which he was suspended from office.
The impeachment motion remained pending in Parliament and was not put to a vote before the term of the House of Representatives ended. The then secretary-general of the Federal Parliament Secretariat subsequently declared the motion inactive.
A writ petition challenging that decision was filed in the Supreme Court. On September 9, the Supreme Court's Constitutional Bench dismissed the petitions, ruling that the impeachment motion against Rana had lost its purpose.
Open Questions
- What is the specific source of the security threat against Rana?
- How long will Rana remain under police protection?
