
Ursula von der Leyen announces new law against addictive designs, subscription traps and non-transparent contracts
AI-generated summary
The EU has passed previous digital laws such as the DSA, the DMA and the AI Act, which primarily target platforms and tech companies. The Digital Fairness Act is intended to align consumer protection online with that in real life.
What are the biggest concerns of Europeans online? The EU has made this the initial question of the “Digital Fairness Act”. The top three answers according to various EU studies:
And that's what it's all about now, says EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen: "With the 'Law for Digital Fairness' we are taking action against addictive and harmful designs on the Internet - for example against methods that specifically attract attention, against non-transparent contracts, subscription traps and manipulation." According to von der Leyen, security must be provided on the internet right from the start - and should not be added later.
Influencers in focus
The previous EU digital laws are primarily aimed at the responsibility of the large platforms, for example when it comes to the protection of minors - or at limiting the market power of the largest tech companies. The “Digital Fairness Act” is now intended to bring consumer protection online into line with that in real life, when shopping locally.
The focus here is, for example, on influencers, i.e. basically anyone who uses the reach on social media platforms for paid advertising. This should be clearly marked in every post in the future. You are not allowed to make false promises and are not allowed to target minors anyway. “But I hope that this will also be addressed for adults,” says SPD European politician Katarina Barley. “Here too, companies deliberately use addictive designs.”
Eight billion euros in damage
Because there's one number that makes you sit up and take notice: around eight billion euros - according to the EU Commission, that's how much damage was caused to consumers in the EU last year by problematic online business models. For example, says European politician Barley, through these methods: "You start ordering something, for example a concert ticket or a trip, and at the end, when it comes to paying, the price is suddenly much higher."
According to the EU Commission's plan, "false discounts", i.e. those that only come about through an artificially high comparison price, should also be banned. Likewise appeals like “Quick! There are only two copies of this product available.”
Do we really need a new law?
Certainly all measures in the interest of the consumer. And yet, this question comes primarily from business associations: Couldn't all of this be regulated by existing EU laws - such as the DSA ("Digital Services Act"), the DMA, the AI Act, the Consumer Rights Directive or the planned EU Kids Act?
Well, the planned “Digital Fairness Act” could make the Internet in Europe more consumer-friendly, according to the digital expert for the Greens in the European Parliament, Alexandra Geese - if you really limit the power of the tech platforms and algorithms:
The negotiations are now entering the hot phase. The new “fair rules” could probably not be implemented and legally binding until 2029.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
The negotiations on the Digital Fairness Act are entering the hot phase and the new rules could not become legally binding until 2029 at the earliest.
Likely · Within years

In a letter to EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Chancellor Friedrich Merz spoke out in favor of maintaining EU emissions trading (ETS) and called for investment security. While supporters and green steel producers support the course, the energy-intensive industry is storming against it.

Due to public prosecutor's investigations into allegations of sexual harassment, Tübingen's mayor Boris Palmer is temporarily suspending his public appearances. The non-party head of the town hall rejects the allegations and announces full cooperation.

The EU Parliament and member states have agreed on a budget of around 199.7 billion euros for 2027. The agreement still has to be officially confirmed, but is considered a formality. At the same time, the EU countries are arguing about the multiannual financial framework for 2028 to 2034.

The EU Parliament and member states have agreed on the 2027 EU budget after nightly negotiations in Brussels. Almost 199.7 billion euros are available; the agreement still has to be confirmed as a formality. At the same time, the positions for the multiannual financial framework 2028 to 2034 are far apart.
Mathias Döpfner received the Theodor Herzl Prize from the World Jewish Congress and gave a speech as an imaginary conversation with Theodor Herzl. He warned of anti-Semitism from various political directions, emphasized German responsibility for the Shoah and described Axel Springer as a “Zionist company”.
In an interview with WELT, Robert Habeck assesses the US midterms as a signal of hope for American democracy, accuses the Trump government of betraying Ukraine and rules out a political comeback in the foreseeable future. He also analyzes geopolitical interests in the Arctic and Greenland.