AI-generated summary
The conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues, with the front line frozen. According to Strack-Zimmermann, Russia is losing 30,000 soldiers a month but continues to invest in the war. The FDP warns of hybrid attacks and calls on institutions and companies to take personal responsibility.
EU defense politician Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann (FDP) has warned that Russia's strategy of dividing society could work. "Vladimir Putin is playing for time. He thinks we are complete wimps and says: 'If I penetrate them long enough, then society will fall apart,'" said the chairwoman of the Committee for Security and Defense in the EU Parliament in a video interview with the editorial network Germany (RND). “We have to take this seriously because it creates fear and uncertainty – and fear is always a very bad advisor.”
Strack-Zimmermann sees no progress by Russian forces on the battlefield. “Russia is deeply unsuccessful in Ukraine, the front is frozen, but not only is it losing 30,000 soldiers a month, it is investing everything.”
In the interview, the FDP politician calls for a self-check: "The state can't protect everything and that's why I want institutions and large companies to check themselves: Where am I vulnerable and what hybrid attacks could happen? To believe that someone will jump out of the cake and say how everything works - that won't happen."
Kretschmer is “not only too naive to recognize that Russia proves every day that it does not want to negotiate,” wrote the FDP politician on Platform X. He also wants Germany to co-finance the “Russian war machine” in order to “cause even more suffering and deaths.” The Prime Minister is “really one of the Union’s biggest foreign policy wrong-doers”.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Russia will continue its strategy of dividing society through disinformation and fear-mongering.
Likely · Within months
The debate about the right Russia policy within the Union will continue.
Very likely · Within weeks
In the opening event of the “Merkel unplugged” series, former Chancellor Angela Merkel called on students to fight more for democracy, to talk less about the AfD and to make their own political offers instead. She emphasized the importance of compromises with clear boundaries, rejected cooperation with the AfD and criticized Chancellor Friedrich Merz's language towards asylum seekers. At the same time, she admitted failures in digitalization and defense during her 16 years in office and advised against emigration.
The Junge Union had to pay back state funding amounting to around 348,509 euros because it could not provide sufficient evidence of its use. To do this, she took out an interest-bearing loan of around 300,000 euros from the CDU. The repayment was due to funds from the Federal Ministry of Family Affairs that were not used or were not used in a timely manner.
Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania's Prime Minister Manuela Schwesig (SPD) maintains her criticism of the CDU and Chancellor Friedrich Merz after they described SPD leader Bärbel Bas as "miscast", "unacceptable" and "blocker". Schwesig's spokeswoman Lilly Blaudszun mentioned Merz's concrete statements to journalists for the first time, according to which Bas was hardly present and did not present anything, although her plight was known. The CDU rejected the allegations and emphasized that it had demanded personal consideration for Bas.

The Berlin Greens have resumed interrupted exploratory talks with the Left and the SPD after a dispute over anti-Semitism and the inclusion of MP Vanessa Emde. The federal party criticizes the actions of the Berlin regional associations, while internal conflicts over further coalition policy emerge.

Friedrich Merz is looking for a new story for his ailing coalition while talking a lot about justice. An analysis by Sebastian Fischer questions the seriousness of his statements.

Sebastian Kurz criticizes the political developments in Germany and Europe as taking a wrong turn in migration, energy and location policy. He warns of profound changes caused by AI disruption that could be stronger than the industrial revolution and emphasizes the need for implementation rather than mere communication in politics.