
Clearly, appeasement doesn’t work and dependence just feeds leverage. Collective action is the only effective stand that states can take
South Korea faces heavy pressure from the US over a US$350 billion investment deal agreed last year, highlighting the risks of economic dependence and appeasement in trade negotiations.
AI-generated summary
South Korea signed a US$350 billion investment deal last November for a tariff reduction under US pressure.
Zhou Xiaoming is a senior fellow at the Centre for China and Globalisation in Beijing and a former deputy representative of China’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations Office in Geneva.
Published: 4:30pm, 24 Oct 2026
The anxiety gripping Seoul is palpable. Under US pressure, South Korea signed a US$350 billion investment deal last November for a 10-percentage-point tariff reduction, billing it as a strategic alliance. Barely a year on, the facade has crumbled.
Last month, US President Donald Trump announced a US$200 billion tranche of the deal with no South Korean official present. Blindsided, Seoul restated its “commercial viability” clause. Trump’s response was blunt. “If they don’t want to do it, that’s OK with me. I’ll just charge them more,” he told reporters. “Tell them if they don’t sign shortly, I’m going to double it up.”
For South Korea, the numbers are sobering: US$350 billion represents 18 per cent of its annual gross domestic product. Even if much of it is channelled through loans, guarantees and corporate outlays, it risks upward pressure on the won, crowding out domestic investment and political exposure if projects underperform.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
US will double tariffs if South Korea does not sign shortly.
Likely · Within weeks

In an interview, IPAC Executive Director Pei Lunde said that the international community's counterattack against Beijing's expansionary interpretation of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 is only the first step. Taiwan should break away from the "who represents China" framework in the 1970s, push all countries to update their Taiwan policies, and face up to Taiwan's actual existence and global role as a democratic governance entity.

On the occasion of the 81st anniversary of the victory of the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's liberation, activities were held in many places on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to commemorate Taiwan's return to the embrace of the motherland. The article emphasizes that Taiwan's restoration has international legal validity, refutes the actions of the Lai Ching-te administration and "Taiwan independence" forces that downplay and beautify colonial practices, and calls for joint efforts to promote the reunification of the motherland.

Taipei Mayor Chiang Wanan raised the issue of the relocation proposal, mentioning that there were "only" 32 people in critical condition in Matsu. Writer Zhu Youxun criticized this statement on Facebook as absurd and opportunistic, ignoring the medical evacuation needs of outlying islands such as Kinmen and Penghu, and pointed out that Songji has a geographical advantage in emergency medical evacuation that cannot be replaced by Peach Machine.

Nobel Prize winner in economics Kluman wrote an article arguing that the U.S. government should take back control of "Starlink" from billionaire Musk. He used Taiwan's F-16 fighter jets as an example to question the rationality of private companies controlling key wartime communications and national security powers, arguing that this should not be decided by individual business owners.

Hong Kong authorities should act as a 'visible hand' to break down barriers and revive growth through a maiden five-year plan, according to former Beijing official Deng Zhonghua.

Senior journalist He Guisen wrote an article in Nikkei Asia analyzing the Taipei mayoral election, pointing out that Shen Boyang's main municipal strategy has worked. If Chiang Wanan loses the election, it may affect his prospects for the 2028 presidential election and prompt Beijing to re-evaluate its strategy towards Taiwan.