
Schufa refuses to delete historical data earlier. Now the data protection organization NOYB is taking it to court.
AI-generated summary
Research showed that Schufa stores historical data for up to ten years. NOYB then warned the credit agency in August.
In mid-July, research by the Süddeutsche Zeitung with NDR and WDR showed that the credit agency Schufa stores historical data, such as information about old loans, seizures or even personal bankruptcies, for up to ten years. The European data protection authority NOYB then warned Schufa in August. According to data protection rules, such information would have to be deleted after a certain period of time. Now the dispute is going to court.
Schufa “decisively rejects” NOYB’s allegations and, according to its own statements, refused to issue a cease-and-desist declaration until September 9th. In a 26-page letter to the NOYB, Schufa had its lawyers reject the demand for cease-and-desist declarations. The credit agency had already emphasized at the end of August: “We will defend the storage of historical data in court – even if we go to the Federal Court of Justice again.”
Schufa Holding AG argues that it stores historical data “precisely in order to meet legal and regulatory requirements”. The data would be stored “in accordance with the legal requirements and the storage periods agreed with the data protection authorities”. Historical data is required in order to develop scientifically reliable credit ratings (scores) and to check their quality.
If Schufa loses in court, the consequences would be enormous
The NOYB reacted immediately: "This makes it certain: NOYB will file an injunction. Interested parties can also continue to register for a possible class action lawsuit." Schufa’s arguments are “completely grotesque,” says NOYB chairman Max Schrems. "Apparently Schufa believes that it is some kind of semi-divine institution that is above European laws. We look forward to putting an end to this."
If the data protection officers are proven right in court, this could have massive financial consequences for the credit agency. Since Schufa claims to have stored credit-related information on around 68 million people, even a small compensation amount per capita could result in total claims of astronomical amounts.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
NOYB is filing an injunction against Schufa.
Very likely · Within weeks
A Norwegian court has allowed the appeal of Marius Borg Høiby, the son of Norway's Queen Mette-Marit. In June he was sentenced to four years in prison for rape and other crimes.

Schufa refuses to delete historical credit data and rejects the allegations of the data protection organization NOYB. The NGO is now announcing an injunction while the dispute is expected to be decided in court.

The President of the German-Israeli Society, Volker Beck, is filing a constitutional complaint in Karlsruhe because he is not allowed to appear as a co-plaintiff in the trial over Iranian murder plans against him.
The dispute between the data protection organization NOYB and Schufa over historical data is heading towards court proceedings. Since Schufa rejects a cease and desist declaration, NOYB is planning a lawsuit and is preparing a possible class action lawsuit.

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has made it clear that with comprehensive insurance, the so-called workshop risk lies with the insured. Insurers only have to cover necessary repair costs, not excessive or unnecessary workshop bills.

In the legal dispute over eye screenings at dm, the competition center is seeking a ruling from the Karlsruhe Regional Court. The chamber is examining the admissibility of the offer, in which AI-supported screenings are carried out without doctors. A verdict is scheduled for November 26th.