Centre fast-tracking new aviation rules under Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024, for court review
The Supreme Court will hear a plea regarding unpredictable airfare fluctuations and baggage charges, as the Centre fast-tracks new aviation rules.
AI-generated summary
The Supreme Court is hearing a plea regarding airfare fluctuations and reduced baggage allowances by private airlines in India.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Monday a plea seeking regulatory guidelines to control the "unpredictable fluctuations" in airfare and ancillary charges imposed by private airlines in India.
As per the apex court's cause list of September 7, the matter would be heard by a bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta.
On August 17, the Centre had told the top court that it has fast-tracked the framing of rules under the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024, which is aimed at modernising India's aviation sector, and the same would be finalised within three weeks.
The government had placed the draft rules before the bench in a sealed cover and said some final discussions were going on.
The apex court had noted that Additional Solicitor General Anil Kaushik, appearing for the Centre, sought three-week time to get the draft rules finalised and place it before the court.
The top court is hearing a plea filed by social activist S Laxminarayanan, who has sought a robust and independent regulator that ensures transparency and passenger protection across the civil aviation sector and regulatory guidelines to control the "unpredictable fluctuations" in airfare and ancillary charges imposed by private airlines in India.
Senior advocate Ravindra Srivastava, appearing for the petitioner, had argued before the bench that till the time the new rules come into force, the old rules are operating.
Questioning the "lack of willingness" on the part of authorities and the effectiveness of the existing mechanism, he had argued that airlines were charging exorbitant fares.
On July 13, the top court had asked the Centre to place the rules framed under the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024, before it.
It had said the rules be placed before it in a sealed cover, irrespective of whether those have been placed before Parliament.
While hearing the plea on May 15, the apex court said there should be some rationalisation of airfares and asked the Centre to provide relief to flyers.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was then appearing in the matter for the Centre, had told the bench that the new enactment of 2024 had come into effect in January 2025 and the corresponding rules were in the process of being prepared.
On November 17 last year, the top court sought responses from the Centre and others on Laxminarayanan's plea.
While hearing the matter in January, the top court said it would interfere with the "unpredictable fluctuations" in airfares and flagged the exorbitant rise during festivals.
It had termed the exorbitant rise in airfares by the airlines "exploitation" and asked the Centre and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation to file their replies on the plea.
The plea claims that all private airlines have, without any credible justification, reduced the free check-in baggage allowance for economy-class passengers from 25 kg to 15 kg, "thereby converting what was earlier part of the ticketed service into a new revenue stream".
It says the "new policy of permitting only a single piece for check-in and the absence of any rebate, compensation or benefit to passengers who do not avail themselves of check-in baggage demonstrates the arbitrary and discriminatory nature of the measure".
The plea claims that currently, no authority has the power to review or cap airfares or ancillary fees, allowing airlines to exploit consumers through hidden charges and unpredictable pricing.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Centre to place draft rules before the Supreme Court within three weeks
Very likely · Within weeks
A London court ruled that British resident Ajith Kumar Mupparapu can be extradited to India to face trial over allegations of poisoning his former wife's family with arsenic and plotting to kill her father in Hyderabad.
The Bombay High Court directed a son to vacate a flat gifted by his parents in 2005 after he failed to fulfill the condition of caring for them, ruling the transfer void under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act; legal experts clarify that the son retains no inheritance rights while parents are alive, as the self-acquired property reverts to them upon cancellation of the gift deed.
Colorado Governor Jared Polis has appointed former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar as a special envoy to mediate a decades-old land access dispute at the 80,000-acre Cielo Vista Ranch, involving historic rights of land grant heirs and current property owners.
USCIS has denied and revoked multiple H-1B visa petitions after discovering a major IT consulting firm in Vermont misclassified skilled technology roles to pay lower wages, a move intended to protect American workers from unfair competition.
After a 70-year legal dispute, the heirs of a Florida physician have secured the right to develop Snipe Key, a 7.9-acre island. Appellate courts ruled that the government cannot retroactively extinguish residential development rights established at the time of sale.
Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan criticised police for allegedly assaulting protesting students during the NEET agitation at Jantar Mantar, warning that lawbreaking by officials breeds lawlessness.