
AI-generated summary
The advertisement states that the property was embarrassed and put up for sale due to a debt. The sales transaction is carried out through the esatis.uyap.gov.tr platform and the relevant file number is stated as 2026/5 SALES.
Sample No:55*
T.R.
FERIZLI
(SULH HUKUK MAH.) SALES OFFICER
2026/5 SALE
ADVERTISEMENT OF THE PROPERTY IN THE NEWSPAPER OR ON THE INTERNET NEWS SITE
Due to a debt, the goods whose types, quantities and values are written below have been put up for sale, and detailed visuals of the seizure, conditions regarding the auction and detailed explanations can be accessed at esatis.uyap.gov.tr with the file number 2026/5 SALES.
Type, nature, location, estimated value and important characteristics of the real estate decided to be sold:
01/10/2026
(EBL art.114 and art.126)
(*) The term interested parties also includes easement right holders.

The Chief Public Prosecutor's Office stated that the allegation circulating on social media does not reflect the truth and that no application has been made to the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office regarding this matter.

The estate of Murat Topaloğlu, who was born on 14/09/1969 in Alifuatpaşa neighborhood of Geyve district of Sakarya province and died on 19/09/2002, is registered with the Istanbul Bar Association, Atty. He was appointed as liquidator by Hasan Ünal and started to be liquidated through bankruptcy procedure. Creditors must submit their demands and evidence to the Gebze 3rd Civil Court of Peace within 1 month, and debtors must inform themselves and their debtors; Otherwise, they may face criminal liability.

In the case of appointing a representative to the Heritage Partnership, filed by Alper Kaan Kırtioloğlu, it was decided to notify the defendant by announcing the petition and the hearing date on 19/11/2026, since the defendant could not be notified via his address and the address search was inconclusive.

In the case filed by Şaban Yurtseven against Nurcan Dana, it was decided to notify the defendant's party by making a declaration of acceptance and the reasoned decision stating that the assets specified in the science, construction, agriculture and TDU expert reports were determined to have been grown and created by Yurtseven, as it could not be notified at the Defendant's address and the address search did not yield any results.

In the report prepared by Izmir Dokuz Eylül University, it was stated that there were years of negligence in the incident that caused Ferdi Zeyrek's death as a result of electrocution in the pool machine room. The 4 thousand 680 watt electrical load of the pool and lighting system exceeded the regulation limit by 4 thousand 136 watts and the project was not rearranged. The expert committee found 4 people primarily at fault, 9 people at secondary fault, and Ferdi Zeyrek was deemed not at fault. The incident took place in Manisa on the evening of June 6, and Zeyrek died in the hospital on June 9.

At the hearing held in the hall opposite the Marmara Closed Penal Institution at the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court, the unarrested defendant driver Oğuz Kaan Demircioğlu repeated his statement regarding the money delivery to Ahmet Şahin and the FaceTime calls. Businessman Furkan Remzi Ceylan made statements about the 66 million lira debt payment and KİPTAŞ advance payment. City planner Adem Altıntaş responded to the allegations regarding the construction of nurseries, the purchase of garbage trucks and consultancy fees. At the hearing, the defense of 306 undetained defendants was completed and postponed until tomorrow.