
In the case filed by Şaban Yurtseven against Nurcan Dana, it was decided to notify the defendant's party by making a declaration of acceptance and the reasoned decision stating that the assets specified in the science, construction, agriculture and TDU expert reports were determined to have been grown and created by Yurtseven, as it could not be notified at the Defendant's address and the address search did not yield any results.
AI-generated summary
Şaban Yurtseven filed a lawsuit against Nurcan Dana regarding property rights or usage rights. In the case, expert reports were received regarding the claim that the structures and trees on a certain parcel in the farm village were grown and created by Yurtseven.
BASIS NUMBER: 2024/37 Basis
DECISION NO: 2025/185
PLAINTIFF: ŞABAN YURTSEVEN
DEFENDANT: NURCAN DANA
The reasoned decision notification issued to you in the trial of the case filed against you by the plaintiff could not be notified on the grounds that you were not at your address. Since no results could be obtained from the address search, it was decided to notify the reasoned decision publicly.
"1- The case is ACCEPTED due to the declaration of acceptance on the part of Melek Kaya, İdil Oğuz Özcan, Selamettin Çelik,
2- With the ACCEPTANCE of the case, the details of Sinop Province, Merkez District, Çiftlik Village, Köyiçi Locality, 134 island 9 parcel, in the scientific expert report dated 02.02.2025 and in the construction expert, agricultural expert and TDU expert report dated 12/05/2025; The barn mentioned at number 1, the Barn mentioned at number 2, the House and six haylofts mentioned at number 3, the warehouse and six haylofts mentioned at number 4, the Concrete Dryhouse and Garage mentioned at number 5, the Wooden Dryhouse and Garage mentioned at number 6, the Greenhouse mentioned at number 7 and 4 plum trees aged 15-18, 1 mulberry tree aged 50-60 years, 1 piece of mulberry tree aged 40-45 years. TO DETECT THAT THE linden tree, 3 walnut trees aged 25-30 years, 1 pear tree aged 50 years, 3 apple trees aged 10 years, 2 vine trees aged 15 years, and 1 hazelnut tree aged 15 years were grown and created by plaintiff Şaban Yurtseven,
Concerning; "In the face of the plaintiff, in the absence of the other parties, the decision given at the Samsun Regional Court of Justice within 2 weeks from the notification of the reasoned decision to the parties, with the possibility of appeal, was clearly read and explained in due form."
It is notified by announcement to be valid instead of the reasoned decision.

Ferizli Civil Court of Peace Sales Officer decided to sell the real estate due to a debt and made the sale announcement accessible on esatis.uyap.gov.tr with file number 2026/5 SALES. While the announcement includes details such as the type of real estate, its location and estimated value, it states that easement owners are also included in the definition of those concerned.

The estate of Murat Topaloğlu, who was born on 14/09/1969 in Alifuatpaşa neighborhood of Geyve district of Sakarya province and died on 19/09/2002, is registered with the Istanbul Bar Association, Atty. He was appointed as liquidator by Hasan Ünal and started to be liquidated through bankruptcy procedure. Creditors must submit their demands and evidence to the Gebze 3rd Civil Court of Peace within 1 month, and debtors must inform themselves and their debtors; Otherwise, they may face criminal liability.

In the case of appointing a representative to the Heritage Partnership, filed by Alper Kaan Kırtioloğlu, it was decided to notify the defendant by announcing the petition and the hearing date on 19/11/2026, since the defendant could not be notified via his address and the address search was inconclusive.

In the report prepared by Izmir Dokuz Eylül University, it was stated that there were years of negligence in the incident that caused Ferdi Zeyrek's death as a result of electrocution in the pool machine room. The 4 thousand 680 watt electrical load of the pool and lighting system exceeded the regulation limit by 4 thousand 136 watts and the project was not rearranged. The expert committee found 4 people primarily at fault, 9 people at secondary fault, and Ferdi Zeyrek was deemed not at fault. The incident took place in Manisa on the evening of June 6, and Zeyrek died in the hospital on June 9.

At the hearing held in the hall opposite the Marmara Closed Penal Institution at the Istanbul 33rd High Criminal Court, the unarrested defendant driver Oğuz Kaan Demircioğlu repeated his statement regarding the money delivery to Ahmet Şahin and the FaceTime calls. Businessman Furkan Remzi Ceylan made statements about the 66 million lira debt payment and KİPTAŞ advance payment. City planner Adem Altıntaş responded to the allegations regarding the construction of nurseries, the purchase of garbage trucks and consultancy fees. At the hearing, the defense of 306 undetained defendants was completed and postponed until tomorrow.

The Turkish Grand National Assembly Commission approved the bill regulating the activities of foreign digital accommodation platforms in Türkiye. The regulation, which imposes a 5 million TL document fee, a 17% commission limit and a representative requirement, will come into force on January 1, 2027.