
AI-generated summary
Bolu Belediyesi'ne yönelik açılan irtikap davası, belediye başkanı ve market yetkilileri arasındaki iddiaları konu almaktadır.
Bolu Belediyesi’ne yönelik "irtikap" davasında görevden uzaklaştırılan Belediye Başkanı Tanju Özcan, market yetkililerinden para talep edildiği iddiasına ilişkin 7 yıl 3 ay 15 gün hapis cezasına çarptırıldı.
Kurban olayı kapsamında ise 34 mağdur yönünden Tanju Özcan hakkında her mağdur için 1 yıl 15 gün ile 1 yıl 8 ay arasında verilen hapis cezası ertelendi.
Dolandırıcılık suçundan ise Özcan beraat etti.
Ayrıntılar geliyor…

Tanju Özcan, who was suspended from his duty as Mayor of Bolu, was sentenced to 7 years, 3 months and 15 days in prison in the trial. The sentence regarding the sacrifice incident was postponed.

On the 37th day of the IMM trial, the court made an interim decision to have secret witnesses present at the hearing, to intervene in the file by Beylikdüzü Municipality, and to bring the witnesses by force. The next hearing will be held on November 2, 2026.

The prosecutor's office presented its opinion in the Gaziosmanpaşa Municipality Case. Effective repentance was requested for Aziz İhsan Aktaş, and imprisonment and release were requested for the detained Mayor Hakan Bahçetepe on the charge of bribery. The decision will be made on October 27.

In the trial of Gaziosmanpaşa Mayor Hakan Bahçetepe, the prosecutor requested the release of the mayor, who has been detained for 16 months. Bahçetepe is on trial on charges of bribery and asset laundering, with a sentence of up to 24 years in prison.

The 9th hearing regarding the mining disaster in Erzincan's İliç district was held at Erzincan 1st High Criminal Court. The court decided to continue the arrest warrants for the defendants and to wait for the expert report and postponed the hearing to January 26, 2027.

The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals found the QR coded documents submitted by a divorced couple in Belgium in the recognition case in Türkiye insufficient, on the grounds that they did not meet the certified document requirement stipulated by Law No. 5718, and approved the rejection decision of the local court.