Tarrant County jury finds contractor NAE Enterprises liable for plumbing and foundation defects that made home uninhabitable
A Texas family was awarded more than $21.6 million after a Tarrant County jury found contractor NAE Enterprises and others liable for construction defects, including sewer vents ending in the attic and an improperly sealed foundation, that made their home uninhabitable and caused health problems.
AI-generated summary
The McCoy family purchased a home in Texas in 2018 and noticed a strong smell before completing the purchase. Years later, a plumber discovered that sewer vents ended inside the attic, allowing sewer gas to spread through the house. The family also reported moisture entering through an improperly sealed foundation, leading to mould growth. They took legal action against the contractor and others involved in the construction.
The home's sewer vents ended inside the attic, allowing sewer gas to spread through the house. (Representational photo)
A Texas family has been awarded more than $21.6 million after faulty plumbing and construction defects allegedly made their home unsafe to live in. Ronny and Mandy McCoy noticed a strong smell before buying the house in 2018. Years later, a plumber discovered that the home's sewer vents ended inside the attic, allowing sewer gas to spread through the house. The family said the conditions affected their health, causing migraine headaches, breathing and skin problems, dizziness and other ongoing concerns. They also reported moisture entering the house through an improperly sealed foundation, leading to mould growth. According the Morning Star, the family took legal action against the contractor and others involved in the construction. After hearing the case, a Tarrant County jury awarded them more than $21.6 million. This included $10 million in additional damages against contractor NAE Enterprises. The house remains unfit to live in. The family had to leave the property on the advice of the Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners and now lives in a recreational vehicle (RV) parked on their land.
Family noticed strong smell
According to court filings, the McCoys raised concerns about a strong odour before completing the purchase in 2018. However, it took years before a plumber identified the source of the problem. The plumber found that the home's plumbing vents ended in the attic instead of directing the sewer gases outside. This allowed sewer gas to circulate inside the house. The family alleged that exposure to the gas caused migraine headaches, respiratory and skin problems, dizziness and other continuing health issues. There were also problems with the house's foundation. The family said it had not been properly sealed, allowing moisture to enter the property. This led to mould growth and other problems linked to dampness. The case also included claims about insects attracted by moisture inside the house. Evidence presented during the trial covered the plumbing defects, foundation problems, moisture entering the property and mould.
Jury awards family more than $21.6 million
The trial began on October 5 in the 67th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas. The jury announced its decision on October 13 after about two hours of deliberations. It awarded the family more than $21.6 million, including $10 million in exemplary damages against NAE Enterprises. The jury found that the construction defects involved knowing and intentional violations of the state's Deceptive Trade Practices Act. It also found that the contractor was negligent and responsible for serious failures in the construction and supervision of the work. The jury assigned 77% of the responsibility to NAE Enterprises. Dauenhauer & Associates was assigned 10%, while Ricky Dauenhauer was assigned another 10%. The findings of gross negligence and the additional damages awarded were unanimous.
Lawyers say builders must ensure homes are safe
The family was represented by Maggie Neusel, Sabine Wakim and Kristina Baehr of Just Well Law, a law firm based in Austin. Wakim said families trusted builders to construct houses that were safe and met required standards. "Every family who hires a builder is counting on the same thing: that their home will be built safely and to code. The McCoys counted on NAE, and NAE did not deliver," she said. She added that the verdict sent a message that builders were responsible for the houses they constructed and the families who lived in them. Neusel said homeowners could not check every plumbing line, attic or wall themselves. Builders and contractors therefore had a responsibility to ensure that homes were safe and suitable for living. "This was not simply a case of poor workmanship. It was a profound failure of responsibility, with devastating consequences," she said.
Family hopes verdict helps other homeowners
The McCoys said the experience had been difficult for their family. They thanked the jury and hoped the decision would encourage other homeowners to raise concerns about construction defects and unsafe conditions. "We hope this verdict will encourage other families to be heard when they suspect construction defects and toxic conditions that threaten them in their homes," the family said. They also said they hoped to begin recovering from the experience while helping prevent similar incidents from affecting other families. The case was heard in the 67th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
NAE Enterprises or other defendants may appeal the jury verdict
Likely · Within months
Other homeowners may come forward with similar construction defect claims
Possible · Within months
The Iowa Supreme Court ruled on November 6, 2026, that Lynae D McMillen Dickey Tesdall, a co-owner who lived in a Mason City home but did not sign the promissory note, was entitled to a separate notice of her right to cure before foreclosure. The court reversed the district court's judgment and vacated the Court of Appeals' decision, remanding the case for further proceedings.
The Iowa Supreme Court ruled on November 6, 2026, that Lynae D McMillen Dickey Tesdall, a co-owner who did not sign the promissory note but was listed as a borrower on the mortgage, is entitled to a separate notice of her right to cure before foreclosure. The court reversed the district court's judgment and vacated the Court of Appeals' decision, remanding the case for further proceedings.
A Texas family has been awarded more than $21.6 million after a Tarrant County jury found contractor NAE Enterprises and others liable for plumbing and construction defects that made their home unsafe. The verdict includes $10 million in exemplary damages against NAE Enterprises, which was assigned 77% of responsibility.
The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal overturned a temporary injunction against neighbours Brad and Audrey Hatcher in Brad Hatcher and Audrey Hatcher v. Restorical LLC, finding that wedding venue Sydonie Mansion in Mount Dora failed to prove irreparable harm from alleged gunfire, chainsaw and airboat noise, loud music, and roaming dogs during ceremonies.
India's Supreme Court has ruled that a grandson cannot claim a share in property inherited by his father from his grandfather, ending a 29-year legal battle. The bench held that under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, a son becomes the absolute owner of inherited property and can deal with it exclusively, including excluding his sons.
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a Rajasthan High Court application on October 27, 2026, directing completion of Rekha Sharma's appointment as a civil judge. Sharma, who has low vision and a government-issued 40% disability certificate, faced a medical board reassessment reducing her disability to 30%, jeopardizing her benchmark disability status and reservation benefits under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.