Trump administration seeks Supreme Court enforcement of USPS mail-in ballot rule

Synopsis

The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to enforce a new postal service rule. This regulation tightens standards for mail-in ballot delivery ahead of elections. A judge had previously blocked the rule, citing potential disruption to legitimate votes. The Justice Department seeks to lift the temporary injunction preventing enforcement. This action follows previous legal challenges to the directive on mail-in ballots.

President Donald Trump's administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to let it enforce a new U.S. Postal Service rule tightening the use of mail-in ballots, moving swiftly after a judge temporarily blocked the regulation ahead of November's midterm elections.

In an emergency request, the Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to lift Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani's order temporarily preventing the USPS from enforing the new rule, which it adopted following an executive order by the Republican president to restrict mail-in ballots.

Also Read: Trump doubles down on sanctions, military pressure as Iran refuses to yield

The USPS regulation would impose new voter-specific data and ballot envelope standards, and potentially refuse the delivery of ballots that do not comply, which critics say could disrupt thousands of legitimate votes as the November 3 vote approaches.

Republicans are locked in a tight battle to retain control of Congress in the election. Critics say restricting mail-in ballots would stand to disproportionately benefit Republicans given that Democratic voters traditionally have been more likely to use mail-in ballots.

Live Events

It is the second time that the administration has turned to the Supreme Court as it defends Trump's directive against legal challenges by states and voting rights groups. On August 24 the court lifted an earlier injunction imposed by Talwani in June blocking Trump's order.

That decision, powered by the court's 6-3 conservative majority, faulted a coalition of mostly Democratic-governed states for suing too soon, but left the door open to another challenge. The court's three liberal justices dissented.

RULE WOULD TIGHTEN STANDARDS FOR MAIL BALLOT DELIVERY

Under the new USPS rule, states must provide lists of mail ballot recipients to the postal service and use agency-approved outbound and return ballot mail envelopes outfitted with unique barcodes. The postal service could then refuse to send out ballots that do not comply with the new standards or are associated with voters who do not appear on the lists.

Also Read: US judge blocks Trump's newest order limiting birthright citizenship

Trump, who signed his executive order targeting mail-in ballots in March, has for years cast doubt on their security, although evidence of voter fraud is rare. Trump has made false claims of widespread fraud in U.S. elections including his 2020 loss to former Democratic President Joe Biden.

The administration in its written filing on Thursday urged the Supreme Court to allow it to implement an "important federal policy to protect the mails from being used to commit voter fraud."

A coalition of mostly Democratic-governed states and Washington, D.C., as well as a number of voting rights groups, challenged the new USPS rule.

Talwani issued a temporary order on August 27 blocking the rule for 14 days, finding that it likely violates the U.S. Constitution, under which the states administer elections, and would be impossible for the states to comply with given the rapidly approaching midterms.

The Justice Department asked the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to put the judge's order on hold, but did not wait for a decision before turning to the Supreme Court.

Talwani also held a hearing on Thursday to consider whether to issue a longer-term injunction.