
Emphasizing the abstractness of diplomatic language, the text criticizes the silence in Türkiye's international relations through Azerbaijani President Aliyev's messages to Türkiye, US President Trump's changing attitude towards Erdogan, and the independence day ceremony held in Cyprus.
AI-generated summary
The text emphasizes that diplomatic communication is not direct but based on interpreting the meanings between what is said and written. In this context, it analyzes the situation in Türkiye's international relations through Azerbaijani President Aliyev's messages to Türkiye, US President Trump's changing attitude towards Erdogan and the independence day ceremony held in Cyprus.
A diplomat is someone who can read between the lines and understand what they see, not just a looker.
READING BETWEEN THE LINES
The language of diplomacy is, to say the least, strange. Almost never anything is said or written explicitly. In diplomacy, the most common written communication texts, which are referred to as "Note verbal", although written, are written in such a style that even the declaration of war note is broken out of politeness. When asked about the polite tone of the British note declaring war on Japan, Churchill's response: "If you have to kill someone, being polite won't cost you anything" is the best explanation for this. What is important in diplomatic communication is to be able to read between the lines of what is written and said because the purpose is hidden there.
STATEMENTS OF İLHAM ALIYEV
The speech made by Azerbaijani President Aliyev a few days ago is full of messages to Turkey, but Turkey's name is not mentioned anywhere. Aliyev briefly said, "The Karabakh success is ours. We bought the weapons we used with our own money. They even sold these weapons to us at a higher price than what they sold to others," meaning "Turkey should not try to claim too much of Azerbaijan's Karabakh success." It is Erdoğan who said. The words "Azerbaijan will form its foreign policy in a way that no one can interfere" and "No one should interfere with our way of life... Serious measures are being taken against ideological risks and will continue to be taken" seem to be a reaction to the criticisms voiced in Turkey against Azerbaijan's relations with Israel and the ban on clothes that do not comply with the principle of secularism in schools.
TRUMP'S WORDS
During his novice (!) period, with his rowdy attitude, he said to Erdoğan on the day Turkey's Peace Spring Operation started, "Don't forget the priest. I will destroy your economy. Don't be foolish!" Even Trump, who wrote a letter saying, has started to get used to the language of diplomacy. Even though from time to time he still gets rude and indiscreet and says whatever comes to his mind, for example, "He knows best how to cheat in the election!" Even though he says that, he cannot praise Erdoğan lately. "He is a very good friend of mine. He does whatever I say!" he says. In the language of diplomacy, this expression means, "I tell him what to do. He does it." Erdoğan's lack of reaction to Trump, in the face of President Aliyev's words that only Azerbaijan will decide his country's foreign and domestic policy, is even more striking.
NOT LOOKING, BUT SEEING
Speaking of Trump, it may be useful to look at a photo that includes the USA.
A few days ago, the Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus held "66th Independence Day of the Republic of Cyprus" ceremonies in Nicosia. The Republic of Cyprus, which was liberated from British colonial rule in 1960 and established as an independent state with the London and Zurich Agreements, of which Turkey was a party and guarantor, collapsed in 1974 due to the attempt of Greece, one of the other two guarantor states, to annex Cyprus, and there are currently two separate states on the island. However, it is not a strange sight for a state to celebrate the day it gained independence and hold a military ceremony. However, the situation is different for those who can see the purpose of the photograph.
At the ceremony watched by the British and Greek Chiefs of Staff, Greek Defense Minister Dendias described Cyprus as "the gain of Hellenism"; Military units of Turkey's ally (!) USA, England, France and even Egypt attended this ceremony, where he accused the Turkish Armed Forces, who have ensured peace and stability in Cyprus since 1974 and prevented the massacre of Turkish Cypriots by the Greeks, of being "invaders"; Parade of heavy weapons purchased from the USA, F-16 warplanes and Israeli air defense weapons, whose range includes the southern coast of Turkey; Most importantly, Turkey's silence and unresponsiveness to this development and its failure to bring this incident to the agenda with its allies show what the photo tells. This ceremony is a clear message of defiance to Turkey in every aspect.
The Republic of Türkiye has never been so underestimated or ignored in any period of its history. Those who put Turkey in this situation even against Azerbaijan should be ashamed.
AI outlook — possibilities, not facts
Türkiye's differences with its allies on the Cyprus issue will come to the fore in the coming weeks.
Likely · Within weeks
Aliyev's foreign policy statements will further strengthen Azerbaijan-Israel relations.
Possible · Within months
British Prime Minister Andy Burnham's message of rapprochement with the EU and his statements about the harms of Brexit started a new political debate in the country and had a wide public response.

More than 200 people were prosecuted in three weeks after the fund explosion on September 16, but no political or public official is still the subject of investigation. It has been announced that those who have gained ill-gotten gains can deposit money into SDIF accounts, but the legal basis is unclear. Experts compared the change in CMB's Investor Compensation Center regulation to a meteor impact and stated that precautions were not taken. Official statements mentioned negligence, intent, fault and bad faith, but there was no organized crime or major fraud.

Through Knut Hamsun's novel 'Hunger', published in 1890, it is told that the author's young writer hero in Kristiania struggles with hunger; It is emphasized that the novel examines not only physical hunger but also hunger as an idea that disrupts the mind and social relations. Hamsun's inconsistencies, such as his support for Nazi Germany and his admiration for Hitler, are mentioned. It is then shown that the distribution of wealth in Türkiye is highly unbalanced: the richest 10% holds 68.4% of the total wealth, the richest 1% holds 35.1%, and the poorest 50% holds only 2.7%. According to Forbes data, the wealth of only 42 individuals and families reaches 105.3 billion dollars. Wealth is not just cash, but companies, shares, real estate, and means of production, as well as ownership of future income. Class differences are evident in daily life: one takes private lessons, the other works to contribute to the family, one chooses a university and the other pays the rent. In Türkiye, a new capital culture was formed in the conservative environment, which had been against luxury in the past, and wealth turned into ostentation. Poverty is not just limited to food, it affects all areas of life such as housing, heating, health, education, culture and holidays; Without money, a person pays by spending his time, and life is reduced to survival. It is dangerous to see inequality as the natural state; Policies such as taxes, wages, working conditions, social security, education and health determine the distribution of income and wealth. Türkiye has become a testing ground in terms of hunger and class inequality; While ancient writers wrote about hunger, now this subject is considered 'shameful'. Works such as Erol Toy's 'Eyeblind' and Orhan Kemal's 'Drunks' tell about workers' life and class struggle. While the data clearly shows, some politicians say 'Poverty has been eliminated!' and this situation is criticized. In the end, it is not the wealth of a country that matters, but in whose hands this wealth is concentrated, and images such as a child in a worker's home pulling on his cardigan and running in the cold remind us of this reality.

As the trial of comedian Deniz Göktaş begins on charges of 'insulting the President' and similar charges, the role of humor and satire as a tool of social criticism is being examined through classical literature.

The concept of banalization is associated with the loss of individual freedom and originality; It is analyzed through authoritarian regimes, fascist tendencies, economic domination and cultural uniformity; The author emphasizes the effects of the lack of resource wealth and the decrease in intellectual vitality on social and individual development.

Anthony Bourdain redefined gastronomy and travel by focusing on people and cultural contexts rather than food. By bringing up the culinary hierarchy, immigrant labor and social classes, he adopted the idea of presenting food as a story and context, not just a taste. His legacy is that he made gastronomy a means of uniting people rather than a means of consumption.